Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 26 April 2012.

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#NB and AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 16 – Child who is

#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2004.#Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2007.#Aldo Celozzi v Innungskrankenkasse Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundessozialgericht - Germany.

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Deutsche Bank AG and BHW Bausparkasse AG v European Central Bank.

#Appeal – Commercial policy – Commercial policy measures concerning certain products originating in the United States of America – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/502 – Measures adopted by the United

of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands. # Failure to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services - Obligation to use the services of a national undertaking for the production of

alert – Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Execution – Measures to be taken and action based on an alert – Surrender of the object seized to the Member State issuing the alert – National

adoption of a resolution scheme – Obligations of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and of the European Commission – Article 20 – Valuations for the purposes of resolution – Requirements – Articles 88

#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas and the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.

#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 14 March 2013.#Jutta Leth v Republik Österreich, Land Niederösterreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2017.#M. S. v P. S.

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 April 2004.#Sakir Öztürk v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria.

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue

#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).