It alleged that section 55 of Regional Law no. 1 of 2000 had also violated Article 11 of the Convention, taken alone, and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).

Power Station where he was also elected shop-steward.

Further, allowing the applicant association’s initial administrative-law appeal, it also quashed the decision of the Federal Office of Communication of 22/05/1996.

Besides having elements of a social insurance scheme it also contained elements of a contractual and, in particular, damage insurance scheme.

It also notes that the Government did not provide any information indicating the exact number of days the applicant spent in those cells alone.

The applicant was also ordered to pay lump-sum court costs.

They had also provided evidence to support their claims.

It has also tackled new social problems, such as those of a sexual nature.

Constant video surveillance also deprived him of any privacy when using the toilet.

They also claimed restitution of the immovable property in question, moral damages, compensation for movable goods, including interests, statutory interest and legal costs.

The Constitutional Court also awarded no compensation for any non-pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant.

It also concerns the allegedly inhuman and degrading conditions he was subjected to during his stay in the transit zone and the alleged lack of appropriate measures that would normally be required with

The State also applied for the final amount of the compensation to be determined.

The Court therefore accepted that the prohibition of wearing emblems for paramilitary prisoners was also necessary to ensure a safe working environment for the prison staff.

Article 10, alone and in conjunction with Article   14: The Court recalled that Article   10 applied also to military personnel.

It also claimed restitution of the immovable property in question, moral damages, statutory interest and legal costs.

It could also have been prevented by means of alternative, less intrusive methods.

GARCIA DE ENTERRÍA , and also Mr. M.-A. EISSEN , Registrar , and Mr. H.

In this respect he also relies on Article 4 of Protocol No.

   Holds by four votes to three that it is not necessary also to examine the case under Article 13 (art. 13);   8.