CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517DEC000973210
17 mai 2011
Beyer, a lawyer practising in Cologne. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
Page 10 sur 14
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0406DEC000233964
6 avril 1967
Since 1967 he is living in Cologne/Germany. On .. January, 1962, a German law student of the University of Graz, S, accused him of having an agreement with a crammer, Dr.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520JUD002540594
20 mai 1998
language (Rule 28 § 3). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0407DEC000247265
7 avril 1967
In September, 1961, he instituted legal proceedings against this second employer before the Labour Court in Cologne, but he does not indicate what decision was given by this court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0423JUD002288593
23 avril 1998
represent him (Rule 30). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002542094
16 décembre 1997
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant designated the lawyers who would represent him (Rule
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0406DEC000313467
6 avril 1968
The firms contracting either on a piece price or on an hourly basis (Unternehmerbetriebe bzw Arbeitsvertragsbetriebe) always paid the prison the full wage, in accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules on the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0522JUD002196193
22 mai 1998
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated the lawyer, Mr P.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001779207
13 janvier 2011
:#ff0000 } .s6CCEAD68 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0424JUD002805495
24 avril 1998
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated Mr C. Clerides as the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308JUD002269215
8 mars 2018
On 8 November 2016 these complaints were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0926JUD002561394
26 septembre 1997
Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule 21 § 4 (b)).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC004260908
24 mars 2015
They are represented before the Court by Ms Wenk, a lawyer practising in Lindau and – since December 2011 – by Mr Kempen, a law professor at the University of Cologne. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003666107
12 avril 2018
Criminal proceedings were instituted following a complaint lodged by J.T., a German national, at the Polish Consulate in Cologne. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC000755703
11 septembre 2007
On 29 January 2002 the Cologne District Court confirmed the Federal Office’s decision for the following reasons.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140656
5 décembre 2013
Furthermore, Cologne Regional Court has also been reinforced with additional personnel. Members of the civil section have been assisting the criminal section for several years.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-140801
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0924JUD002594294
24 septembre 1997
designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002552894
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant church expressed its wish to take part in the proceedings and designated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1126JUD002715995
26 novembre 1997
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings