CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

276 résultats pour « Collomb Me Rullier »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517DEC000973210

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2011

17 mai 2011

Beyer, a lawyer practising in Cologne. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Page 10 sur 14

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0406DEC000233964

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1967

6 avril 1967

Since 1967 he is living in Cologne/Germany.   On .. January, 1962, a German law student of the University of Graz, S, accused him of having an agreement with a crammer, Dr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520JUD002540594

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

language (Rule 28 § 3). 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0407DEC000247265

Admin. suprême

7 avril 1967

7 avril 1967

In September, 1961, he instituted legal proceedings against this second employer before the Labour Court in Cologne, but he does not indicate what decision was given by this court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0423JUD002288593

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1998

23 avril 1998

represent him (Rule 30). 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002542094

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1997

16 décembre 1997

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   33 §   3 (d) of Rules   of Court   A, the applicant designated the lawyers who would represent him (Rule  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0406DEC000313467

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1968

6 avril 1968

The firms contracting either on a piece price or on an hourly basis (Unternehmerbetriebe bzw Arbeitsvertragsbetriebe) always paid the prison the full wage, in accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules on the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0522JUD002196193

Admin. suprême

22 mai 1998

22 mai 1998

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated the lawyer, Mr P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001779207

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

:#ff0000 } .s6CCEAD68 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0424JUD002805495

Admin. suprême

24 avril 1998

24 avril 1998

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated Mr C. Clerides as the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31). 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308JUD002269215

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2018

8 mars 2018

    On 8 November 2016 these complaints were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0926JUD002561394

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 1997

26 septembre 1997

Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule   21 §   4 (b)).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC004260908

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2015

24 mars 2015

They are represented before the Court by Ms Wenk, a lawyer practising in Lindau and – since December 2011 – by Mr Kempen, a law professor at the University of Cologne. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003666107

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2018

12 avril 2018

    Criminal proceedings were instituted following a complaint lodged by J.T., a German national, at the Polish Consulate in Cologne. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC000755703

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2007

11 septembre 2007

On 29   January   2002 the Cologne District Court confirmed the Federal Office’s decision for the following reasons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140656

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2013

5 décembre 2013

Furthermore, Cologne Regional Court has also been reinforced with additional personnel. Members of the civil section have been assisting the criminal section for several years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-140801

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2013

5 décembre 2013

Furthermore, Cologne Regional Court has also been reinforced with additional personnel. Members of the civil section have been assisting the criminal section for several years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0924JUD002594294

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 1997

24 septembre 1997

designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule   30). 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002552894

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1997

16 décembre 1997

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   33 §   3 (d) of Rules   of Court A, the applicant church expressed its wish to take part in the proceedings and designated

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1126JUD002715995

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 1997

26 novembre 1997

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   33 §   3   (d) of Rules   of Court   A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings

Source officielle