Moldova , no. 23393/05, § 30, 13 March 2007; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006-X; Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister v.

Application no. 33492/96 )                       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   21 December 2000       In the case of Jabłoński

  388, § 35; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/06, § 80, 21   December 2000). 51.

(extracts); Jablonski   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   79, 21 December 2000).

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

  Pologne , n o   28358/95, § 68, CEDH 2000 ‑ III, Jablonski c.   Pologne , n o 33492/96, §   91, 21   décembre 2000, Kadem c.

Article   5 §   3 the authorities, when deciding whether a person is to be released or detained, are obliged to consider alternative means of guaranteeing his appearance at the trial (see Jablonski

that the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention be decided speedily, which implies that such proceedings must be conducted with the requisite expedition and without unjustified delays (see Jablonski

Jabłoński,   J. M łynarczyk ,   conseillers   ; –     pour les requérants M e   R. Orlikowska-Wrońska ,   conseil , MM.   Z.

Article   5 §   3 the authorities, when deciding whether a person is to be released or detained, are obliged to consider alternative means of guaranteeing his appearance at the trial (see Jabłoński

detention pending trial are entitled to “special diligence” on the part of the authorities (see, for example, Abdoella v. the Netherlands , judgment of 25 November 1992, Series A no. 248-A, p. 17, § 24; Jabłoński

Pour ce qui est des périodes considérées par la Cour comme excessives, ils renvoient notamment aux arrêts Jabloński c. Pologne du 21 décembre 2000 (quarante-trois jours), Nikolov c.

Jablonský, avocat au barreau tchèque. Le gouvernement tchèque (« le Gouvernement ») est représenté par son agent, M. V.A. Schorm. 3.

the Convention not only lays down the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabloński

that provision proclaims not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000). 2.

  36, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21   December 2000). 45.

seulement "le droit d’être jugé dans un délai raisonnable" mais il prévoit également que la mise en liberté peut être subordonnée à une garantie assurant la comparution de l’intéressé à l’audience ( Jabłoński

Harazin, judgment of 10/01/2006, final on 10/04/2006 27504/95   Iłowiecki, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02 36258/97   J.G., judgment of 06/04/2004, final on 06/07/2004 33492/96   Jabłoński