CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC001496215
1 février 2024
The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision.
Page 10 sur 14
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909JUD003013312
9 septembre 2021
A report ... concerning an administrative offence punishable by administrative detention shall be sent to a judge for examination immediately after it has been drawn up.”
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC002747307
6 mai 2014
A.S. and the other soldiers were sent on the mission without any weapons, other than axes for cutting wood and ropes. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC000863421
16 mai 2024
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD003650311
8 octobre 2015
As an example of this, the CEC mentioned the statement of three observers from Polling Station no. 25 (see paragraph 17 above). 25.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706
16 juin 2015
They also referred to the DVD containing footage of the village submitted to the Court by the applicant in 2008 (see paragraph 56 below) claiming that the person who can be seen walking between the houses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319JUD002200411
19 mars 2020
application (see Brežec v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0319DEC001718418
19 mars 2024
Rahimli, had sent a letter to the Penitentiary Service of the Ministry of Justice requesting to visit these two applicants.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218JUD006558313
18 février 2021
In particular, they stated that more time was needed to complete the investigation (see paragraphs 20, 23, 26 and 33 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD003452813
19 novembre 2020
, among other authorities, Gafgaz Mammadov v.
1re chambre 1re section
5fd94fc713beb2387aaac2fb
25 février 2020
VERSAILLES N° Chambre : 3 N° Section : N° RG : 17/02395 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : -Me Soulèye macodou
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD000979617
3 avril 2025
see paragraphs 9, 23 and 27 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915JUD003784713
15 septembre 2015
Resuming the investigation for a third time, nearly fourteen years after the event, cannot be seen as an effective remedy in these circumstances (see Railean v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD000893709
10 novembre 2016
The same standards also apply to investigations in cases where a person dies in suspicious circumstances in which the State’s positive obligation under Article 2 is at stake (see Mikayil Mammadov v.
cr
6137263acd58014677423ef2
4 mars 2003
et de l'expertise, le seul grief susceptible d'être adressé au Dr Vadim Y... est de n'avoir pas ordonné dès le 18 juillet 1997, le transfert de son patient vers le service de réanimation de l'hôpital Mamao
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD005506911
6 octobre 2022
Yes indeed, all of that was a scheme and both the Sheki community and Ashraf Mammadov ... had to be punished.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11763
28 novembre 2017
(See also Lutsenko v. Ukraine , 6492/11, 3 July 2012, Information Note 154 ; Tymoshenko v. Ukraine , 49872/11, 30 April 2013, Information Note 162 ; Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-128167
15 octobre 2013
They are represented before the Court by various lawyers practising in Azerbaijan (see Appendix).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922DEC001189917
22 septembre 2022
be held in hearing rooms rather than in judges’ chambers (see paragraph 3 above). 17.
ECLI:CEDH:001-245113
2 septembre 2025
Did the domestic courts’ decisions not to examine the evidence proposed by the applicants undermine the overall fairness of the proceedings (see Murtazaliyeva v.