The applicants were thus given the same number of shares in the resulting company in execution of the judgment in their favour.

same time, it concluded that the case file clearly indicated that the applicant had used forged documents to obtain the reimbursement of expenses and that his use of money advanced by the company other than

She then applied for judicial review.

Thus, she made no written or oral submissions to the court. 12.

  The applicant pointed out that all witnesses mentioned, totalling more than 30, knew the case.

Thus, 33 candidates were assessed by the Committee. 8.

  She is thus dependent on him.   The position of the Secretary of State is that this dependency is unsubstantiated.

helplessly witnessed their detention and removal despite his administrative and then judicial appeals – were not, however, exacerbated by a concern that their lives were in danger.

The burden then passed to the defendant to show, again on the balance of probabilities, that the money had instead come from a legitimate source.

In May 1995, the appeal was declared admissible, then various procedural acts were carried out until June 1996.

The applicant, who had by then spent more than three months in custody, was released on bail by the Spanish authorities ten days later before being re-arrested on the basis of a new request for his extradition

Thus, he recommended that the prosecutor reconsidered whether to reply.

Having managed to find only USD 287,000 from various sources, the applicant gave the money to the police, who made an inventory and returned it to the applicant, who was then to give it to the kidnappers

Since then, the applicant has been registered as a foreigner in Azerbaijan.

He then refused to talk to his father.

  The sentence imposed was only a little lower than the average sentence for the kind of offences in question, which could be explained by the factors referred to by the City Court other than the

more than ten years.

  Thus, the applicant was confronted with an accusation of which he had previously not been informed.

(i) Was the applicant unjustifiably treated less favourably than others on grounds of disability?

  Both had then got into a car and driven off together with the applicant.