In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and to strike the case out of the list of cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

    Relevant domestic law The domestic law relevant to this application is set out in Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom , no. 42949/98, §§ 40-41, 25 July 2007.

Accordingly, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to strike the case out the list.

the applicant’s representative by registered post on 25 September 2007 in which his attention was drawn to Article 37 §   1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out

letter was sent to the applicant by registered post on 25   September 2007 in which his attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out

letter was sent to the applicant by registered post on 25   September 2007 in which his attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

In these circumstances, the cases should be struck out of the list.

It therefore, decides to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the application out of its list of cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to strike the case out of the list.

Accordingly, in so far as the complaint under Article 3 is concerned, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and to strike the case out the list. B.

    Relevant domestic law The relevant domestic law is set out in Macovei and Others v. Moldova , nos.

    Relevant domestic law The relevant domestic law is set out in Macovei and Others , cited above, §§   16-18.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 and to strike the case out of the list.