Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : - Maître Nadège DE RIBALSKY Décision déférée au Premier Président de la Cour d'Appel: Décision fixant les honoraires de Me Nadège DE RIBALSKY rendue

Monsieur a un passeport d'urgence qu'il a utilisé une fois pour se rendre en Algérie. On a une difficulté au niveau des diligences. Nous n'avons pas de laissez-passer consulaire.

    The applicant firstly disputed the Government's assertion that his injuries could have been sustained due to several falls from his own height.

  In his written submissions to the Court the applicant explained the factual circumstances concerning his income and set out his arguments as to whether or not an additional taxation should be imposed

He received no reply to his letter. 11.

    On 7 May 2013 the Syktyvkar Town Court dismissed the applicant’s claims in his absence, stating that his ability to attend the hearings was not provided for by law and that his handcuffing

communication with his daughter. 51.

current relationship, and whether his parents knew of his homosexuality.

The execution of his sentence had been suspended from 28 January 2014 pending the examination of his pardon.

choice to represent his interests before the domestic courts. 7.

given his history of low mood of self-harm when in distress”.

His placement at the EBI had been unlawful and contrary to Article 6 of the Convention since neither he nor his counsel had had access to the information which had led to his placement and he had thus

A lawyer hired by his brother was present at the hearing, but was not allowed to talk to the applicant or to represent his interests.

    The applicant complained that the length of his detention on remand had been unreasonable.

    The applicant submitted that a direct consequence of the domestic decisions by which his claim was dismissed as time-barred was his loss of copyright over his photographs and slides.

Following his death, his wife has been entitled as his widow to a pension of one-third of that paid to the first applicant.

involvement in the terrorist attacks of 9/11 had already been determined, contrary to his assertion.

request for his dismissal as having been lodged in time.

He had also sought to ensure that his undertakings were legally enforceable.

order relating to his sentence ( incidente di esecuzione ).