On 23 May 2002 the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Civillietu tiesu palāta ) upheld the applicants’ claim in part and awarded them LVL 10,013.85, to be paid by the company

    The Court, having regard to its case-law (see, notably, Panetta v. Italy , no. 38624/07, §§ 29 and 31, 15 July 2014, as well as Romańczyk v.

    The opposition group Ictimai Palata was planning a demonstration to be held on 19 June 2011 in Baku.

    On 16 October 2006 the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Civillietu tiesu palāta ) quashed the decision of the regional court and issued a new ruling.

    The applicants in all three applications were members of a political group called the Public Chamber ( İctimai Palata ).

    On 4 April 2007 a hearing took place on 4 April 2007 before the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Civillietu tiesu palāta ).

    On 7 April 2005 the Criminal Cases Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Krimināllietu tiesu palāta ) upheld the judgment of the first-instance court. 7.

The second applicant was a member of the Coordination Council of an opposition group İctimai Palata .

    On 28 May 2007 the Civil Cases Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Civillietu tiesu palāta ) – after appeals by A.L., Preses Nams, and Mediju nams – re-examined the case and delivered

    On 16 December 2006 the Criminal Cases Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Krimināllietu tiesu palāta ) upheld the applicant’s conviction on appeal.