He was also stripped of his military rank (sergeant major).

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his right to respect for his correspondence and his right to a fair trial had been breached in so far as letters had been seized on the orders of

Reiterating his statements, the applicant relied in particular on Article 10 of the Convention, arguing that his remarks had been made in the context of the defence of his client’s interests as a civil

Anyone who insults another person in his presence, or, although in his absence, in public, or with the intention that the insult shall reach such a person, shall be subject to a fine or the penalty of

The report prepared by the prison workers responsible for monitoring A.C. had stressed his good behaviour during his previous periods of prison leave. 27.

At certain points he asked his neighbours for assistance in compiling his complaints.

His application has been rejected because his case does not in the Justice Secretary’s view meet the statutory test for compensation under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.”

D.K. then turned around and started walking towards his car, at which point S.K. stepped out of his house onto the street.

He further complained that his right to respect for his private life had been violated by the recording of his conversations and search of his office. 4.

    After he had sold the practice, the police had occasion to question the applicant about his dealings with JDS, and took a statement from him. No criminal prosecution ever occurred.

He maintained that the deterioration of his health and his invalidity resulted from his military service which he should not have done.

relevant to the specific issue raised by the applicant in his defence.

and given evidence at his trial.

  After the death of the applicant's father, Gautsträsk 1:16 was, at this time, owned by the applicant, his mother and his two sisters.

The judge acknowledged that the coverage was “tendentious in the extreme” and went on to say: “There were allegations made about his criminal activities which went beyond any of his previous convictions

The applicant asked the Court not to reveal his identity.

  Pointing out that the applicant had last seen his daughter on 04/10/1997, when she had been just two years old, the European Court found that the measures taken by the Portuguese authorities with

costs order after his acquittal.

    The applicant complained that his right to peaceful enjoyment of his property had been violated, in that he had been illegally deprived of his shares in Demirbank and could not receive any

right to fulfil his electoral mandate and the electorate’s legitimate expectation that he would serve his term as senator. 58.