More than 100,000   people were killed and more than 2,000,000 others were displaced as a result of “ethnic cleansing” or generalised violence.

All of them were rejected following an inquiry. 9.

However, on 31   May 2004 the Rostov Regional Court found that there were no grounds for quashing the decision of 14 February 2004. 9 .

His allegations to the contrary were unsubstantiated, as there were no traces of such a request in the case file. His defence rights had not therefore been violated. B.

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

He added that whether the prices were quoted in euros was irrelevant, as they were rising in absolute terms. 2.     The Court’s assessment 37.

In 1990 two of the properties were purchased from the State by the tenants.

    On 5 August 2000 the charges against the applicant were changed back to forcible assertion of right.

A number of the applicant’s co-workers were also taken to the Police Department for the same reason.

The names of the former manager and of the receptionist on duty at the relevant time were unknown.

Until 2001, the inmates were not allowed to possess or use ventilators. Likewise, until 2001, the inmates were not allowed to possess a radio. Subsequently, small radios and ventilators were allowed.

A number of issues were raised during the discussion, but the ones considered to be the most important were the following: a)   stigmatisation as a result of HIV/Aids, b) discriminatory treatment

The proceedings were video recorded. 18.

They were not provided with bed sheets or crockery. The cells were infested with insects and mice. The food was of a low quality. 2.     Remand prison no.

The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 3.

    The applicants were represented by Mr A. Andreevski, a lawyer practising in Skopje. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr K.Bogdanov. 3.

There was a proper legislative framework in place, and the authorities, who were guided by the best interests of the child, were sufficiently active. 103.

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.

All these decisions, except the last one, were quashed by the supervising prosecutor as unfounded, and additional pre-investigation inquiries were ordered.