Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SARL Cabinet Rousseau et Tapie, avocat de la société Loisirama, de la SCP Françoise Fabiani-François Pinatel, avocat de la

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SARL Meier-Bourdeau, Lécuyer et associés, avocat de la société E.

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SARL Meier-Bourdeau, Lécuyer et associés, avocat de la société E.

avoir conclu, le 22 février 2023, un avenant au contrat de location avec option d'achat souscrit auprès de la société Capitol France Tofinso pour l'acquisition d'un voilier d'occasion dénommé « Red Beau

The expert Z.J. confirmed that M.O. had died because of hypothermia.

All those decisions were set aside as premature by the Prymorskyy District Prosecutor’s Office of Odesa because of insufficiency of the search measures taken by the police.

Because of her behavioural disturbances, she was admitted to the psychiatric ward of the hospital as an involuntary patient.

  91; (xi)   19/11/2012 – the investigator again terminated the criminal proceedings, because of the lack of constituent elements of a crime.

His request was refused because parental leave could be granted to a policeman only if his children were left without maternal care. 9.

  Insofar as they concerned the tasting procedure, they were irrelevant because the results of this procedure provided insufficient evidence.

as its owner, and because he had not brought a claim for inflation losses arising out of protracted enforcement of the judgments. 13.

The judgment was upheld on appeal on 28 May 2001 and became final. 8.

They were postponed either by reason of legitimate impediment of the applicant, or because of witnesses’ absence, or finally because of lawyer’s strikes.

On 19 March 1988 the liquidator asked the court to delay the proceedings because the matter was being examined by him.

Out of forty-two scheduled hearings, six were adjourned at the applicant’s request or due to his failure to appear, five because of both parties’ failure to appear, three because of the non-appearance

The applicant claimed that he had been punished for statements he had never technically made because the courts had confused his words with those of his co-defendant S.

By the police decision dated 31 March 2008 they were discontinued because of formal defects at the commencement of the proceedings.

First, the Government considered the application inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies because the applicant did not challenge the Czech Bar Association’s decision of 12 February 2010 by

a victim of trafficking without any protection and because she would be at real risk of ill ‑ treatment from her traffickers and their affiliates; the applicant had further complained that her