Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158184
28 septembre 2015
28 septembre 2015
The applicant argued that her application was justified because on 27 January 2014 the Warmińsko-Mazurski Governor refused to order expulsion of her youngest child and because, in separate proceedings
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD001376117
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
The applicant complained before the Court that he was denied access to a court because his claims were never considered on the merits by administrative courts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709DEC003698211
9 juillet 2013
9 juillet 2013
For the same reasons, namely only because of the lack of legal provision and therefore the opportunity for the applicant to enter into a registered life partnership, and not because of her inability to
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC003996403
28 septembre 2010
28 septembre 2010
In a judgment of 19 February 2002 the Varna Court of Appeal found against the applicant and upheld the lower court's findings that he had no right of action under the SRDA because the liability of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126612
5 septembre 2013
5 septembre 2013
He maintained that he had fled his home country Syria because he had been persecuted, detained and tortured there.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704DEC004310016
4 juillet 2024
4 juillet 2024
The case concerns the alleged violation of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention because of the sanction imposed
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171808
9 février 2017
9 février 2017
In September 2011 K.P. became pregnant. The couple were planning to continue living in Poland. They started renovating a building adjacent to the home of K.P.’s parents.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156497
23 mars 2015
23 mars 2015
It concluded that there was no difference in treatment of unmarried same-sex couples and unmarried different-sex couples, especially because Austrian law foresaw special rules of custody only for married
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC004469008
8 décembre 2009
8 décembre 2009
S decided to hire another candidate, inter alia because of the latter’s proven interest in navigation. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC001548205
29 avril 2008
29 avril 2008
, any judges shall be ineligible ( kizárt ) who participated in the adoption of the decision to quash or in the adoption of the decision which has been quashed because of ill-foundedness.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC002702718
12 décembre 2023
12 décembre 2023
Accordingly, the lower courts rightfully concluded that the decision [in the misdemeanour proceedings] had been quashed because of the discontinuance of the misdemeanour proceedings as time-barred and
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520REP003285796
20 mai 1998
20 mai 1998
On 21 November 1994 the same court decided that the case could not be heard because the applicant had not been summoned in accordance with the law.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0208DEC000275805
8 février 2007
8 février 2007
The applicant complained under Article 10 of the Convention that he was convicted because he had criticised the President in his Parliament speech in 1993. THE LAW 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122223
3 juin 2013
3 juin 2013
Personal contacts to his mother had been prevented because they ran counter to therapeutic progress.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111018
27 mars 2012
27 mars 2012
The court declared that the Director of Public Registry could not refuse to issue the applicant’s marriage banns just because she had undergone gender reassignment surgery.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503DEC002632716
3 mai 2022
3 mai 2022
required a higher degree of education, the period of the applicant’s employment as a stenographer at the Supetar Municipal Court could not be taken into account as relevant professional experience because
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0929JUD005803216
29 septembre 2022
29 septembre 2022
Because the applicant had at his disposal adequate remedies but did not use them, no facts substantiating his claims of illegal secret surveillance could be established. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC000836912
14 décembre 2023
14 décembre 2023
This company had been founded in 2003, and after some time Yaroslav Dubynevych became its president. [...]
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0909DEC003455302
9 septembre 2004
9 septembre 2004
They also allege that the detention order was unlawful and fabricated, because there was no reasonable suspicion that they had committed a crime. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-123811
10 juillet 2013
10 juillet 2013
These grounds did not cease to exist at present, because they seem real, well ‑ grounded and are confirmed by credible information.
Source officiellePage 106 sur 1597