CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3500
17 janvier 2006
At that time, the applicant’s marriage had already been dissolved for more than three years.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC000001010
6 décembre 2011
dated 23 June 2008, the applicant must have become aware of the alleged ineffectiveness of the investigation into the case by that time, as no concrete progress had been made in the investigation for more
ECLI:CEDH:002-5821
11 janvier 2001
to the documents submitted by the applicant, in particular an estimate by the Minister of Culture and an expert’s report dated 1993, the property appeared to be in very good condition and to be worth more
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0128DEC000184023
28 janvier 2025
Lawyer J.K. asked for more time again on 9 November 2011, and a hearing scheduled for that day was adjourned. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213DEC004180322
13 décembre 2022
It noted, among other things, that it was a matter of a child who had been adopted by his foster parents, with whom he had lived for more than eleven years, more than eight years earlier.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922DEC003254520
22 septembre 2022
The applicant, however, lodged her application with the Court on 25 June 2020, that is with more than twelve years’ delay.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC003315504
16 décembre 2008
The Court notes that the applicant's detention in police custody ended on 17 November 1992, whereas the application was introduced with the Court on 3 August 2004, that is, more than six months later.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160713
21 janvier 2016
The SOD officers then proceeded with the search of the applicant’s car as a result of which more illicit drugs were found hidden in the back seat of the vehicle.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127573
26 septembre 2013
the proceedings (a)     If facts, decisions or evidence have come to light which she/he could not use in the original proceedings through no fault of their own and which may result in a more
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC007668517
10 novembre 2022
Then, for more than five years, the authorities consistently refused to open a criminal case and those refusals were not contested by the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:002-566
12 avril 2011
Its decision had thus constituted no more than a reasonably foreseeable development of the law without any impropriety, let alone arbitrariness.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2185
27 mai 2008
According to an official report, the attack was ethnically motivated, the attacker had a piece of glass in his hand and the consequences could have been more serious had it not been for the intervention
ECLI:CEDH:001-101047
15 septembre 2010
In 1998 the Youth Court, having ordered the removal of the applicants’ children (then aged 11, 9, 7 and 4), waited more than four months before hearing the applicants and more than twenty months before
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1019DEC004548599
19 octobre 2000
  Consequently the court adjourned the case once more.   A final hearing was held on 29 August 1997.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3025175-3338615
11 février 2010
Greek singer (A.V.) in a case that received considerable media coverage, in which the singer had accused his wife, S.P., of fraud, forgery and use of forged documents causing losses to the State of more
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-537230-538868
18 avril 2002
  The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the unreasonable length of the administrative proceedings (which have lasted more than ten years).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-127460
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015DEC000786123
15 octobre 2024
  37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018), finds it more appropriate to examine the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC],
ECLI:CEDH:002-10632
12 mai 2015
  353-FZ had been a remedy that required exhaustion and was relevant for the calculation of the six-month time-limit – The applicants had lodged their applications more than six months after the dismissal
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0303DEC001146585
3 mars 1986
  The lawyer was told that he would have to apply not more than seven days before the intended visit, but that no problems were expected.
Page 106 sur 7138