CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

142 749 résultats pour « More CE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3500

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2006

17 janvier 2006

At that time, the applicant’s marriage had already been dissolved for more than three years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC000001010

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

dated 23 June 2008, the applicant must have become aware of the alleged ineffectiveness of the investigation into the case by that time, as no concrete progress had been made in the investigation for more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5821

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2001

11 janvier 2001

to the documents submitted by the applicant, in particular an estimate by the Minister of Culture and an expert’s report dated 1993, the property appeared to be in very good condition and to be worth more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0128DEC000184023

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2025

28 janvier 2025

Lawyer J.K. asked for more time again on 9 November 2011, and a hearing scheduled for that day was adjourned. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213DEC004180322

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2022

13 décembre 2022

It noted, among other things, that it was a matter of a child who had been adopted by his foster parents, with whom he had lived for more than eleven years, more than eight years earlier.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922DEC003254520

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

The applicant, however, lodged her application with the Court on 25 June 2020, that is with more than twelve years’ delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC003315504

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

The Court notes that the applicant's detention in police custody ended on 17 November 1992, whereas the application was introduced with the Court on 3 August 2004, that is, more than six months later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160713

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2016

21 janvier 2016

The SOD officers then proceeded with the search of the applicant’s car as a result of which more illicit drugs were found hidden in the back seat of the vehicle.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127573

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2013

26 septembre 2013

the proceedings (a)     If facts, decisions or evidence have come to light which she/he could not use in the original proceedings through no fault of their own and which may result in a more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC007668517

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

Then, for more than five years, the authorities consistently refused to open a criminal case and those refusals were not contested by the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-566

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

Its decision had thus constituted no more than a reasonably foreseeable development of the law without any impropriety, let alone arbitrariness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2185

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2008

27 mai 2008

According to an official report, the attack was ethnically motivated, the attacker had a piece of glass in his hand and the consequences could have been more serious had it not been for the intervention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-101047

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2010

15 septembre 2010

In 1998 the Youth Court, having ordered the removal of the applicants’ children (then aged 11, 9, 7 and 4), waited more than four months before hearing the applicants and more than twenty months before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1019DEC004548599

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2000

19 octobre 2000

  Consequently the court adjourned the case once more.   A final hearing was held on 29 August 1997.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3025175-3338615

Admin. suprême

11 février 2010

11 février 2010

Greek singer (A.V.) in a case that received considerable media coverage, in which the singer had accused his wife, S.P., of fraud, forgery and use of forged documents causing losses to the State of more

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-537230-538868

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2002

18 avril 2002

  The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the unreasonable length of the administrative proceedings (which have lasted more than ten years).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-127460

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2013

26 septembre 2013

the proceedings (a)     If facts, decisions or evidence have come to light which she/he could not use in the original proceedings through no fault of their own and which may result in a more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015DEC000786123

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2024

15 octobre 2024

  37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018), finds it more appropriate to examine the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC],

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10632

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

  353-FZ had been a remedy that required exhaustion and was relevant for the calculation of the six-month time-limit – The applicants had lodged their applications more than six months after the dismissal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0303DEC001146585

Admin. suprême

3 mars 1986

3 mars 1986

  The lawyer was told that he would have to apply not more than seven days before the intended visit, but that no problems were expected.

Source officielle

Page 106 sur 7138

← PrécédentSuivant →