The Government argue that the applicant has not exhausted domestic remedies because he never applied for compensation for his detention on remand.

In 1991, after Slovenia became an independent state, the applicant did not obtain Slovenian citizenship because, as he claims, he lived in a bachelor's home and did not, therefore, satisfy the statutory

        The application was refused by the Linz Labour Office (Arbeitsamt) and the Upper Austrian Regional Labour Office (Landsarbeitsamt) because the applicant failed to

Dans le cadre de la seconde procédure, finalisée par l’arrêt du 4   juin 2013 de la Haute Cour de cassation et de justice, le requérant George Becali a été condamné pour des faits de corruption.

Juin 2025 JUGEMENT : rendu le un Juillet deux mil vingt cinq par mise à disposition au greffe REQUÉRANT : Monsieur [G] [O] [J] né le 22 Mars 1977 à LYON 03 (69003), demeurant 15 sant Evans - 22140 BEGARD

    Because of their poor morale and professional qualities, which became apparent when they gave contradictory statements to the Ombudsman, the prosecutor's office and the City and Supreme Courts

The applicant Emin Kırmızıgül has heart problems and became unable to go to work after the imposition of the curfew.

The applicant feared that he would be subjected to arbitrary detention and possibly torture because he was singing Kurdish songs. 46.

Seven days later the court ruling became final and thus enforceable.

certain Articles of the Criminal Code of Procedure referred to the CC and because she had lodged a criminal complaint against them. 46.

In particular, the appellate court took into account the fact that the applicant had sued for damages for physical assault, that the defendant had incurred no additional costs because of the initially

    The construction of this building never started, apparently because of financial difficulties experienced by the municipality and also because its construction would interfere with the ongoing

Because a gigantic genocide of the Bulgarian nation was carried out during this eight-year period.

Because the applicant was now acting in person, the Tribunal decided that it would not be reasonable to expect her to produce the promised schedule.

In 1984 the YPA awarded him, and he became the holder of, a specially protected tenancy ( stanarsko pravo ) of a flat in Zagreb.

He argued, in particular, that he had been unable to work since 16   July 2012 because he had been suspended from driving.

He pleaded not guilty and indicated that he did not need an interpreter because he had studied in Leningrad. 13.

The relevant part of that judgment reads as follows: “In the response to the action the respondent denied the claim because the property in question had been [in] social ownership and because, pursuant

More than anything the evident injury is proven because it cannot be known if the Defendant could have prevented it and how.