The applicant asked the court to adjourn the hearing because he wished to submit his reply. 32.

He complained that the decision had amounted to a ban on the event, because the authorities had not proposed any alternative venue or time for it. 11 .

Because of the severe burns he had serious breathing difficulties and had to undergo multiple skin grafts. 11.

  Paulikas” because the car belonged to his mother.

He also provided evidence to that effect because his telephone had the ability to record times and dates of calls.

She continued: “The only reason why I said I’d lied and made it all up was because I had pressure put on me and I’d been advised by somebody that if I said I was lying, I wouldn’t be sent to prison because

he had bought it from Mr S. in September 2005, and that the public sale had been invalid because by time when the sale had been carried out Mr S. had already paid off the sums in relation to which the

This judgment became binding on 12   February 1998, but was not enforced immediately.

  When A.R. had called the applicant to account for the alleged theft, the applicant, who had drunk during the day, became angry.

Initially, they asserted that the applicant company was itself responsible for the delay, because it had resisted handing in the bond.

       In addition to finding that the defendant surgeon did not act unlawfully (rechtswidrig) because it could be assumed that the applicant would, in the circumstances, have

The judgment became final on 19   February 2001.

    On 1 December 2004 the Council of the KBA, relying on section   23(1) of the Bar Act 2004 (see paragraph 15 below), decided to suspend the applicant’s membership because a charge had

As submitted by the applicant, the interim order in question had not been made enforceable because of the ongoing proceedings in Poland.

He only had the right to visit his daughter (Besuchsrecht) which, however, he could not exercise because he was in prison.

The operation could not be performed, because Calafat Hospital did not have blood for a blood transfusion.

She had missed six months because she had applied to the Court two years and one month after the judgment had become binding.

According to the Government, it was refused because it was inconsistent.

    The applicant also worked in the construction sector for a short period in 2000, after which he could not be officially hired because of his lack of identity documents. 9.