CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021JUD002540494
21 octobre 1997
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated
Page 11 sur 14
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD001697090
19 février 1998
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant stated that he wished to present his own case but the President
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC005031599
22 mai 2001
In May 1998 he managed to escape and fled to Colombo. There he was arrested by the police because he had no identity card.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0325JUD002310393
25 mars 1998
the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0204DEC000432469
4 février 1971
Article 20a of the Criminal Code provides special rules for penalties for habitual criminals, Article 42e regulates the preventive detention for dangerous habitual criminals and Article 264 gives the details
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD002320508
1 février 2011
:#ff0000 } .sF5E1C6CF { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .sE208486F { font-family:Arial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD003218504
1 juillet 2014
ROMANIA (Application no. 32185/04) JUDGMENT This version was rectified on 16 December 2014 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court STRASBOURG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0906DEC001224286
6 septembre 1989
On 2 May 1988 the Commission decided that, in accordance with Rule 42 para. 2 (b) of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, notice should be given to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0429JUD003631797
29 avril 1998
Geus, on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 37 § 1 and 38).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022JUD002189093
22 octobre 1997
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148607
10 novembre 2014
It confirmed that Judge A.K. had been assigned to the applicants’ case in breach of the above rules. However, having regard to its Resolution no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711JUD005481000
11 juillet 2006
the Rules of Court). 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0429JUD003631397
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1203DEC001508889
3 décembre 1991
47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission; Having deliberated; Decides as follows: THE FACTS The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the parties,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0911DEC003196796
11 septembre 1997
On 10 March 1995 the Cologne Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) dismissed the first and second applicants' respective further appeals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021DEC002668095
The applicant, a Turkish citizen, born in 1969 and residing in Cologne, Germany, is a journalist.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002839795
28 février 1996
47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission; Having deliberated; Decides as follows: THE FACTS
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD006124319
8 octobre 2024
Done in English, and notified in writing on 8 October 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923JUD000162003
23 septembre 2010
GERMANY (Application no. 1620/03) JUDGMENT This version was rectified in accordance with Rule 81 of the Rules of Court on 10 May 2011 STRASBOURG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002288093
23 septembre 1998
who would represent her (Rule 30). 3.