In those circumstances, it perceives no causal link between the violation found and any non-pecuniary damage which the applicants may have suffered (see Appietto v. France , no.

When the applicant had looked back, he had seen a group of Romany people surrounded by police officers wearing face masks.

The Court reiterates that domestic courts must make reasonable efforts to summon the parties to a hearing (see Kolegovy v.   Russia , no.

Mammadli , cited above, § 62).

  In the case of Gafgaz Mammadov v.

(see, mutatis   mutandis , Zela v.

Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Ribitsch v.

(see paragraphs 50-52 below). 43 .

Police officers A.A. and I.M. testified that on 7 November 2007 they had seen V.H.

A.J. was subsequently sent to the HSC ward in which he was hospitalised. On 26 April 2000 A.J. was kept under medical observation for the whole day, and his state of health improved.

    The applicants also raised another complaint (see paragraph 11 above) covered by the well ‑ established case-law of the Court.

When the applicant's son failed to respond, the other soldiers were sent to search for him.

  9540/07, 21   October 2014, and Ibrahimov and Mammadov v.   Azerbaijan , nos.

Mammadov, lawyers based in Azerbaijan. 2.     The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Əsgərov. The circumstances of the case 3.

to them by the authorities (see paragraphs 10-20 above).

As noted by the national courts, the applicant’s act was entirely peaceful (see paragraph 17 above).

Mammadov.

In the case of Afgan Mammadov v.

The letter had been sent by post from an address in Moscow. The sender’s name as noted on the envelope was “Valeriy Mardanov”. 11.