CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC003067508
29 juin 2010
s3ACA58F { width:231.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 30675/08, 37254/08, 37264/08, 50424/08 and 52963/08 by Anto
Page 111 sur 1536
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC005688810
6 septembre 2016
By another letter dated 3 March 2016, sent by registered mail to the address of the applicant’s representative, the applicant was invited to state whether she wished to maintain the application, her attention
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167330
16 septembre 2016
On 30 April 2004 the public prosecutor at the now defunct Istanbul State Security Court filed a bill of indictment, charging the applicants and another suspect with disseminating propaganda in favour of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615DEC005387710
15 juin 2017
In the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that on 28 April 2014 the applicant company merged with another company and the later took over all the applicant company
ECLI:CEDH:001-122769
19 juin 2013
After having spent 3 days in cell no. 6, the applicant was moved to another cell, namely cell 10, which he shared with five other detainees.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152948
16 février 2015
At the same time there was an arson and then in January 2011 another arson in the building.
ECLI:CEDH:001-213764
3 novembre 2021
; § 1 of the Convention that the decisions in this case entailed a reconsideration of the matters previously determined by the final decision of the Supreme Court of 6 October 2009 in another
ECLI:CEDH:001-248482
13 janvier 2026
In the reasoning of the final decision, the appellate court held, in essence, that another filiation could not be established with respect to another father, as long as paternity had been established through
4 / 1 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007740410
27 mai 1987
tribunal administratif de Rouen a annulé la décision du 11 février 1983 par laquelle le directeur du CENTRE HOSPITALIER SPECIALISE DU ROUVRAY a réduit de 28 à 8 heures par semaine les vacations de Mme Anat
7ème et 2ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000018259630
30 janvier 2008
MAINE-ET-LOIRE demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler le jugement du 13 juillet 2005 du tribunal administratif de Nantes en tant que, par ce jugement, ce tribunal l' a condamnée à rembourser à Mme Annette
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2137
17 avril 2012
Violence in prison by fellow inmates in reprisal for cooperating with the police: violation Facts – The applicant alleges that, after he gave evidence for the prosecution in proceedings against another
ECLI:CEDH:002-824
24 août 2010
Although he already had representation, the applicant requested the court to appoint another counsel, who he said was specialised in the execution of sentences and sexual offences.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9280
11 février 2014
They had been prescribed by law and had been adopted in pursuit of a legitimate aim, namely “for the protection of the reputation” of another.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2637
7 juin 2007
Law : Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – The applicant company had not presented any proof of the intention of the State Foreign Trade Agency “Soyuzplodoimport” to convert itself into another
ECLI:CEDH:001-247567
10 novembre 2025
MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged breach of the applicant company’s right of access to a court in relation to the determination of a contract and the payment of compensation from another
ECLI:CEDH:002-1992
29 juillet 2008
The school principal then published a reply to that article in another newspaper, since the applicant refused to do so.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3021
30 novembre 2006
Article 8 – Both applicants allege a breach of their right to respect for their family life on account of their forced ten-month separation from one another.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1387
30 juillet 2009
The right to have one’s claim examined within a reasonable time would be devoid of all sense if domestic courts examined a case numerous times, by shifting it from one court to another, even if at the
ECLI:CEDH:001-234575
27 mai 2024
He argues that he had to sign a new contract with another football club and had to move to another city. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209DEC002800602
9 décembre 2008
On 26 September 2008 the Registry of the Court sent the applicant's representative another letter by registered mail stating that unless he submitted the required information by 10 October 2008, the Court