In the months that followed regular medical consultations were continued. 31.

The Estonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Kuurberg, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.

The District Court did not consider it necessary to appoint M. a curator ad litem as it were questions of law which were in dispute between the parties and as there was no obvious conflict between M.’s

    On several occasions the enforcement proceedings were discontinued for various reasons and reopened following complaints by the applicant that these decisions were unfair.

    The Committee notes with concern that, according to the State party’s report (CERD/C/KGZ/5-7, para. 12) and other reports, Uzbeks were the main victims of the June 2010 events but were also

The court decided that further investigative actions were required in respect of the applicant and his co-accused and, given that the applicant was accused of serious crimes, there were sufficient grounds

    The Committee notes with concern that, according to the State party’s report (CERD/C/KGZ/5-7, para. 12) and other reports, Uzbeks were the main victims of the June 2010 events but were also

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, R. Lazareska Gerovska. 3.

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 6   January 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

    In 2001 the applicant and his brother were charged with raping a woman. They were arrested on 18 October 2001 and released on bail on 19   November 2002.

log kept by boiler operators, that certain parts of boiler equipment were not in place, and that there were unauthorised objects on the boiler and in the room.

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

Firearms and ammunition were seized. S.S. participated in the procedure as a witness. On 26 May 1999 the applicant was arrested and on 27 May he was charged with the murder of G.

    In the Court’s view, however, the pecuniary damage suffered by the applicants as a direct result of the violation of the Convention for which the authorities were responsible was less than