CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909
17 janvier 2012
In the closed sessions, the applicant and his representatives were excluded but his interests were represented by special advocates.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002974296
24 juin 1996
to his conduct.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0210JUD005510300
10 février 2004
Therefore, the City Court had correctly qualified his acts as falling under that law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526JUD000244803
26 mai 2005
or her rights and obligations, or about suspicion or accusation for a criminal act, has violated his or her human rights or fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, or his or her right to
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC006044113
11 mars 2014
His father had since died and the witness refused to mention the name of the person who had approached his father, stating that the person was dead.
JLD
67eee77bb848dd6814c62f25
3 avril 2025
J’étais en France car je suis venu rendre visite à mon cousin. Je ne veux pas rester en France, je n’aime pas. Même si on me donnait la nationalité française, je refuserais.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629JUD002396002
29 juin 2006
Pension Act was discriminatory and violated his right to property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD000458709
24 avril 2018
    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD003776602
19 décembre 2006
His detention thus lasted 2   years and over 9   months. 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1128JUD006428401
28 novembre 2006
    Everyone has the right to respect for his ... correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1128JUD004076502
    The applicant was to inherit the apartment of his deceased brother, where relatives of his brother’s wife were dwelling.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201JUD006182100
1 février 2005
’s failure to summon him for the hearing of his appeal. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD005879515
21 décembre 2021
    The applicant complained that the seizure of his car had amounted to an unjustified control of use of his property, in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1.
civ1
61372389cd5801467740b177
24 octobre 2000
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176163
12 juillet 2017
It appears that P. picked up the child in his arms and attempted to run towards a metro station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0222JUD000820978
22 février 1984
   The grand juge transmitted the appeal to the Military Prosecutor, in his capacity as respondent; the latter was entitled to "submit his observations" within ten days (section 189 para. 3 of
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-778561-794895
1 juillet 2003
According to Mrs   Finucane, her husband had received death threats, via his clients, from officers of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (“RUC”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC005101399
14 mars 2000
In his response he pointed out that this particular Advocate-General had had a number of written works published by Kluwer in the time before he became Advocate-General.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13362
20 juillet 2021
action for the protection of personal integrity, that the implementation of the warrants by the SIS had also violated his rights.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11601
25 juillet 2017
The applicant was released in March 2016 following on order of the domestic courts rejecting the prosecutor’s interpretation of the relevant legislation which would have required his continued detention
Page 114 sur 334