CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-99
16 mai 1997
Convention (art. 6-1); and (b) the case does not, for any other reason, warrant
Page 115 sur 342
ECLI:CEDH:001-176
6 octobre 1998
application of the Convention, as the Court has already established case-law on the “reasonable time” requirement in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; and (b) the case does not, for any other reason, warrant
ECLI:CEDH:001-166
3 septembre 1998
1ère chambre
662b43cdfe2545000831494c
25 avril 2024
Transaction messaging', où figure le texte de sms reçus et envoyés par Mme [U] le 26 mars 2022 : - à 18 : 53 :11 'XXXXX : saisissez ce code pour activer la carte Crédit Agricole **XXXX dans votre Wallet
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003236596
4 mai 2000
On arresting the first applicant and A., the police found NOK 10,000 of the marked notes in the first applicant's wallet and the remaining 70,000 in a flat occupied by A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318DEC004670608
18 mars 2014
On 4 June 2007, while the first applicant’s request for asylum was pending, an Italian court issued a European Arrest Warrant (“EAW”) in respect of the applicants, under a European Union
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC002514116
17 octobre 2017
He submitted an arrest warrant dated 5 July 2010. 12. On 6 November 2014 the Migration Agency rejected the applicant’s and his wife’s new requests for asylum.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD000710106
13 novembre 2008
On 4 January 2006 the applicant’s wife hired a lawyer and learned about the detention warrant of 21 December 2004.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0310DEC001304787
10 mars 1988
On 13 February 1987 the applicant filed a complaint against the warrant of arrest of 4 September 1986.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024JUD002296411
24 octobre 2019
On 3 February 2011 the Kyiv Shevchenkivskyy District Court (“the District Court”) issued a warrant for the applicant’s arrest. 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217DEC006072600
17 février 2004
On 26 July 1999 the applicant’s house was searched by the police on the basis of a prosecutor’s warrant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1025JUD001140085
25 octobre 1989
In accordance with the submissions of the Public Prosecutor's Office, the investigating judge dismissed these requests on 6 June, the first because he considered the warrant to be "based on firm
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0629DEC002060292
29 juin 1994
Referring to the warrant of arrest of 8 October 1990, he found that there was a reasonable suspicion that the applicant together with other suspects had committed aggravated fraud by buying goods for a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002410194
17 mai 1995
c) The third set of proceedings concerned the decision of the Zurich District Court by which a final warrant for enforcement of debts (650 SFr) of the applicant's limited company was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0222DEC000181309
22 février 2011
They state that the officers failed to identify themselves and that they searched the applicants’ dwelling without a warrant. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000434506
20 septembre 2016
On 16 March 2001 a senior investigator of the Krasnoyarsk regional prosecutor’s office charged the applicant with large-scale trafficking in firearms and ammunition and issued a warrant for
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0120DEC003540297
20 janvier 2000
On 21 January 1994 a warrant of arrest ( Haftbefehl ) was issued against her.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2537582-2759617
7 novembre 2008
Shortly after a detention warrant was issued against him; he was, however, only arrested in December 2005. He was released in January 2006 when the detention warrant expired.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC003284806
9 octobre 2007
During 1994 and 1995 the police carried out an investigation comprising, among other things, discovery orders against banks, international letters of request, search warrants and numerous interviews of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001332487
19 février 1991
The warrant for the applicant's arrest issued on 25 March 1978 could not be executed, as the applicant had fled. 15.