AVENANT N°1 A L’ACCORD RELATIF A L’ÉGALITÉ PROFESSIONNELLE ENTRE LES FEMMES ET LES HOMMES AU SEIN DE L’UES CREDIT AGRICOLE LEASING & FACTORING

. # Sexta Directiva IVA - Lugar das operações tributáveis - Reembolso do IVA pago noutro Estado-Membro - Veículo automóvel disponibilizado através de um contrato de leasing - Acordo relativo à gestão do

#Sixth VAT Directive - Car-leasing services - Fixed establishment - Rules governing reimbursement of VAT to taxable persons not established in the territory of the State - Principle of non-discrimination

November 2006 the Bucharest prosecutor’s office, taking into consideration the available evidence, the nature of the alleged offence and the applicant’s personal circumstances, prohibited him from leaving

    The applicant claimed compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage, leaving the determination of the sum to the Court's discretion. 25.

    As to the instant case, the Court considers that the Government have not submitted any facts or arguments capable of leading to a different conclusion.

Their shares in the invention were 35%, 20% and 40%, respectively, leaving 5% to a fourth person who is not a party to the proceedings before the Court. 6.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading case Butko v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    The applicant claimed compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage, leaving the amount at the Court’s discretion but expressing his belief that the amount of EUR 1,500 claimed before the

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v.

    In the leading cases of Spahić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017, and Kunić and Others v.

In the leading case of Obluk (§§ 73 and 77, cited above), the Court found a violation in respect of the length of proceedings lasting three years and almost eight months before one level of jurisdiction

This being so, the Court considers it excessive to require the applicant to seek damages from a person who had a tenuous relationship at best with the events leading up to the confiscation (see, conversely