CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0609JUD003104704
9 juin 2011
No distinction was made in these decisions between complainants who were and those who were not represented by counsel. 2. Recent case-law on preventive detention 28.
Page 118 sur 131
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0127JUD000135504
27 janvier 2011
The expropriated properties were valued at 14,639.07 old Bulgarian levs (BGL) [1] .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003205109
3 juillet 2012
This time, the sentences were commuted into a fine of 900 Turkish liras [1] for each officer and were suspended again. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD000432005
25 novembre 2010
The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0526JUD003982207
26 mai 2011
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V. A. Schorm of the Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD003938805
6 décembre 2007
The applicants were represented before the Court by Jean de Salve de Bruneton, a member of the Conseil d'Etat and Court of Cassation Bar.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005603007
12 juin 2014
They eventually went away to have lunch together, intending to celebrate mass amongst themselves.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD000797310
30 mai 2013
On 21 May 2009, a delegation of the GHM went to the new Roma subdivision and the 4 th school.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0929JUD001669805
29 septembre 2011
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD001731806
2 décembre 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306
4 décembre 2015
The Ministry of Communications and the St Petersburg and Leningrad Region Department of the FSB were joined as a third party to the proceedings. 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0303JUD003124003
3 mars 2011
Zupančič, Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, Ann Power, Ganna Yudkivska, Angelika Nussberger, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar, Having deliberated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0609JUD003049304
The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , and by their permanent Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003504105
21 décembre 2010
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000717710
18 juillet 2013
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD001300613
18 septembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD003144904
12 juin 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0416JUD002687305
16 avril 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618JUD001429806
18 juin 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. 3.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3272505-3650095
23 septembre 2010
Following this judgment, Church employers had the right to govern their affairs in an autonomous manner, while at the same time labour courts were bound by the principles of the Church employers’ religious