Arthur, a lawyer practising in Bristol, the United Kingdom. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.

He is an Armenian national and has held an Armenian passport since 2012. 6.

Due to the absence of free convoy cells at the courthouse the applicant was held in the prison van until the start of the hearings and during court breaks.

          At the hearing, which was held on 15 July 1987, the applicants were represented by Mr.   Göran Ravnsborg.

The Supreme Court held, in particular, that the applicant and his co-defendant had been arrested not on 5   July but on 6 July 2001. B.     Relevant domestic law 26 .

The court held that the applicant had suffered physical pain of significant seriousness, which, in turn, had had negative psychological consequences.

(e)     Artur SARKISIAN and Andrei SARKISIAN (born respectively on 23   February 1981 and on 12 November 1982) 20.

For over fifty hours, more than thirty heavily armed terrorists associated with the Chechen separatist movement held over a thousand people captive, the majority of them children.

The second applicant, Mr Artur Simonyan, is the senior pastor and the leader of the applicant organisation. He is an Armenian national, was born in 1966 and lives in Verin Ptghni.

    On 29 September 2016 the SAC held a hearing in which it heard the parties without collecting new evidence.

He was ordered to be held in pre-trial detention for four weeks.

    Application no. 17911/08 by Artur, Corina and Olivia LUNGU v.   Moldova 8.

Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Mr Arthur

    On 19 February 2008 a presidential election was held in Armenia.

The Supreme Court held, in particular, that the law did not require the presence of a lawyer at the moment of giving a confession. 25.

    At a hearing held on 15 November 2006 the applicant refused to undergo the mediation process provided for by divorce law.

In response to the applicant’s argument that he had never been prosecuted and had no criminal record, the Ministry held that it was immaterial in that context whether he himself had committed a crime.

the question whether respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto requires an examination of the application on the merits, the Court points out that it has already held

- discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits. 9,750     21945/21 01/04/2021 Household Artur

KHOKHLOV 1980 Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar of the Komi Republic 25/02/2020   7,500   25758/20 04/06/2020 Abror Akhralovich AZIMOV 1990 Detention in a glass cabin during the hearings held