:#ff0000 } .s6CCEAD68 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align

The Court considered it unnecessary to rule separately on the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 3. Mr Demirci was awarded EUR   4,500 for non ‑ pecuniary damage.

:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s58F22A17 { width:23.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD370BC15 {

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   35 §   3 (d) of Rules   of Court B, the applicants designated the lawyers who would represent them (Rule   31

In pursuance of the group's report the President of the Commission, on 5th April, 1968, made an order under Rule 45, paragraph 2 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure that the application should be communicated

    Lizette Dennis, a British citizen born in 1943 and resident in Cologne, Germany; 2.

Article 14 “The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in [the] Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other

47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;        Having regard to:   -     the Commission's decision of 6 January 1993 to join (Rule 35 of   

    In accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the Court decides to join the applications, given their similar factual and legal background. II.

On the same date and at the applicant's request, the Acting President of the Third Section of the Court decided to indicate to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that the applicant

:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt

    The Court of Appeal expressed its doubts as to whether the rules on reinstitution into the proceedings were applicable to the present proceedings.

C of Cologne.

The applicant in the first case, Mr Guido Strack, was born in 1964 and lives in Cologne. He is represented before the Court by Mr U. Fuchs, a lawyer practising in Miesbach.

:#ff0000 } .sE208486F { font-family:Arial; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break

Yücel Özdemir against Turkey and registered on 6 June 1996 under file No. 24277/94;        Having regard to :   -     the reports provided for in Rule 47 of

  54   §   3 of the Rules of Court.

The remainder of the applications were declared inadmissible, pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sAF7A583A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC800182F { font-family:Arial; color:#0000ff } .s56836E40 { margin-top: