CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC004320898
5 septembre 2000
She is a competent and reliable Communications rating with good keyboard skills and an understanding of Mainframe Computer Operations.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD004819506
11 février 2010
The situation is absurd even: many teachers prefer to avoid methodical institutions as they do not expect anything from them but admonition and disrespect.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417DEC002468314
17 avril 2018
In its judgment, the court may decide that appeal shall have no suspensive effect.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13213
8 avril 2021
When it came to immunisation, the objective should be that every child be protected against serious diseases; this was achieved, in the great majority of cases, by children receiving the full schedule
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD005313911
4 octobre 2016
  346/04 and 39779/04, § 36, 27 May 2014).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0225JUD001969610
25 février 2014
It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Gheorghe Predescu v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD005845513
6 octobre 2015
It may be subject to editorial revision.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118710
18 mars 2013
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC001145907
17 novembre 2009
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003364296
11 mai 1999
    On 16 May 1995 a hearing was held.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4006
15 février 2005
The very length of the proceedings was, to a certain extent, a testament to the applicants’ lack of skill and experience.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115DEC000486002
15 novembre 2007
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD001133204
9 octobre 2012
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Zhelyazkov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD000087813
9 avril 2019
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of A.V. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD003387205
25 septembre 2012
    However, on 17 May 2006 the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Kareliya Republic quashed the judgment of 27 March 2006 by way of supervisory review and remitted the matter for fresh examination
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002495294
11 janvier 2001
    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110JUD003950908
10 novembre 2009
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Horsti v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416DEC003903097
16 avril 2002
In that context, it may be noted that the right of access to court is not absolute and may be subject to legitimate restrictions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0123JUD003806715
23 janvier 2020
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of L.R. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC003252405
3 février 2009
    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
Page 12 sur 31