S.A., who complained of the length of civil proceedings it had instituted;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 19 December 1988 and by the Government of Spain

They noted that they had been cultivating and breeding animals on the said land for forty years, long before the arrival of the present developer.

The latter told him that he had gone to court, where he had said that he had seen Abdulvahap in Şırnak. Upon this, his interrogator had got very angry and he had become scared.

because they had later partly regenerated; and that it could not be categorically said that the applicant had a metastasis in her sixth rib, especially bearing in mind that no further metastases had been

In its decision, the Municipal Court noted that the applicant had concluded friendly settlement with the debtor on 15   January   2008, according to which the debtor had undertaken to pay the

Law – Article 8: The applicant had had the benefit of adversarial proceedings, he had been able to adduce evidence in support of his claims and present his case freely, and his arguments had been duly

intercept had been in place.

not yet had the opportunity of rebutting.

Some of the abductors had been of Slavic appearance; others had been of Asiatic appearance. They had carried firearms with silencers.

She said that she had never been disconnected from the server and had noticed that pseudos such as 'WHORE' were not disconnected either.

Depending on the expected outcome, the two types of assessment could be arguably said to be focused on different questions: – namely, (i) the progress that a prisoner had made in reforming (which could

As a result of the kick in the stomach, he had been taken from the police station to the children’s hospital where he had been operated for incarcerated hernia. 3.

    The applicants appealed arguing that it was inconceivable to enforce the said judgment before the owner of the said account had been determined. 8.

Had he done what he said he had done, was that enough? If he didn’t do what he should have done, then he is an accomplice.

The judge said he did not regard it as reasonably arguable that the District Judge had acted unlawfully in refusing to state a case.

When he went to her house, she said that someone had rung, saying that they had killed Metin Can and Hasan Kaya. He took Fatma Can to the public prosecutor's office.

In the decision it was stated that, during the investigation, T. had been questioned and had said that on 4 May 2012 he had swung a metal bar to protect himself and it was possible that he had hit someone

The chief of staff made a statement and said that they had received information from outside [about the event in Uludere] ...

   Holds by 16 votes to 2 that the said deprivation of liberty was also not justified under sub-paragraph (a) (art. 5-1-a);   7.