as “another procedure of international investigation or settlement” within the meaning of Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention (see Hilal Mammadov v.

from the point of view of these two provisions taken together (see Murtazaliyeva v.

Two were people who stated they had seen one of the officers dragging the applicant out of her vehicle.

Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, 17 March 2016); Mammadli v. Azerbaijan (no. 47145/14, 19 April 2018); and Aliyev v.

a hearing (see paragraph 22 above). 48.

Russia , no. 72967/01, §   66, 1   March 2007, and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan , no.   34445/04, §   74, 11 January 2007).

    Application no. 24506/06, lodged by Yagub Mammadov on 27   May 2006 The applicant, Mr Yagub Mammadov, is an Azerbaijani national who was born in 1941 and lives in Baku.

In the case of Mammadov v.

In his letters sent to the Court in September 2014 Mr I. Aliyev reiterated the complaint concerning the seizure of the case files. COMPLAINTS 1.

Ilgar Mammadov v.

Finally, they stated that a possible reduction in the just satisfaction award would send out the wrong signal to claimants who brought joint proceedings before domestic courts.

  Hakki Kay was last seen on 16 November 1996 when he and two of his friends were forced into a vehicle and driven away by men who introduced themselves as police officers.

They were either self-nominated or nominated by various political parties (see Appendix). 6.

For more information, please see the security cell placement report of 4   April 2017.” 10 .

  Ukraine (no. 15102/10, § 69, 17 December 2015) and Faig Mammadov v.   Azerbaijan (no. 60802/09, § 19, 26 January 2017) . 62.

In the meantime, on 19 July 2002 the Ministry sent a letter to the applicants, informing them that the documents were again returned “with no action taken” by the Ministry.

For reasons of convenience, the text of this judgment will continue to refer to Ms   Maksimova as “the first applicant” and Mr Kapustin as “the second applicant” (see Mammadov and Others v.

that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the State (see Nada v.

Mammadov and Others v.