CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

579 résultats pour « Mickael BOUYRIE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC001935402

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2005

10 mai 2005

In addition, the court held that the evidence relating to the sighting by the two boys of a dead body lacked consistency and reliability, and, in view of the strong circumstantial case against Mr Thomas

Page 12 sur 29

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD006735113

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

in the samples taken from the body of K.A. indicated that he had fired a shot (shots). 21 .

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-570780-573224

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

Thomassen (Dutch), Luigi Ferrari Bravo (San Marinese), Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Boštjan Zupančič (Slovenian), Rait Maruste (Estonian), judges , Feyyaz Gölcüklü , ad hoc judge ,   and also Michael

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1261142-1313783

Admin. suprême

15 février 2005

15 février 2005

President , Nicolas Bratza (British), Viera Strážnická (Slovakian), Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Rait Maruste (Estonian), Stanislav Pavlovschi (Moldovan), Lech Garlicki (Polish), judges , and also Michael

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC005779300

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2004

4 mai 2004

Convention was found as an oral hearing before the Supreme Administrative Court would have sufficed to satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in a situation where a lower judicial body

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68273-68741

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

Andorran), Luigi Ferrari Bravo [1] (Italian), Bostjan Zupančič (Slovenian), Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch), Rait Maruste (Estonian),   judges , Feyyaz Gölcüklü (Turkish), ad hoc judge ,   and also Michael

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC003734297

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

    According to reports of the mental health consultative body ( Psychisch Medisch Overleg ; “PMO”) of the Norgerhaven prison on the applicant’s situation in detention, the applicant required

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2008449-2118835

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Fura-Sandström (Swedish), Khanlar Hajiyev (Azerbaijani), Dean Spielmann (Luxemburger), Danutė Jočienė (Lithuanian), Dragoljub Popović (Serbian), judges , Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch) , ad hoc judge , and also Michael

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0928DEC006391600

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2004

28 septembre 2004

As to the proceedings before the Disciplinary Board, the Court concludes that the Disciplinary Board is a professional body and not a tribunal for the purposes of Article 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0507DEC007739501

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2002

7 mai 2002

The application of Article 6 in respect of appeals involves consideration of the functions, in law and in practice, of the appellate body, its powers and the manner in which the interests of the parties

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC004196498

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

In addition, no photographs were taken of the body and no examination was carried out of the bullets which killed Mehmet Emin Ayhan.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003171696

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

  It appears from an official record subsequently drawn up by the customs officials concerned that they had felt the clock body to be “rather thick” and that, when they tapped it, it had sounded hollow

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0117DEC006156000

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2006

17 janvier 2006

Moreover, the complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2020

15 septembre 2020

It was his body language and attitude. When [the applicant] was so angry, the wrong remark might easily have led to [him] using physical violence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC005189599

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

The respondent State must have a chance to put matters right through its own legal system before having to answer before an international body for its acts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC003456604

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

It states that a body was found covered in blood and that all the evidence was sent to the court. The second document is a Magistrate's “court order”, dated 13 and 22 September 2004.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC002466994

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 1999

14 septembre 1999

    The medical report concerning the first applicant indicated that bilateral-periorbital ecchymotic lesions existed on her body and ecchymotic lesions on the front part of her right shoulder

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD003804902

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

xa0;   The Court also reiterates that, although Article 35 § 1 requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004664399

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was not heard by an independent and impartial tribunal, insofar as the decision to discharge him from the army was taken by an administrative body

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0515DEC004419998

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2001

15 mai 2001

complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was not heard by an independent and impartial tribunal, insofar as the decision to discharge him from the army was taken by an administrative body

Source officielle