CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 610 résultats pour « Schoof »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1031JUD000476218

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2019

31 octobre 2019

and primary schools for the school year 2017/18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC006205900

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

    Enrolment of the applicant’s older daughter in a Turkish-speaking school in a different district On 22 February 1997 the applicant asked the Kođađik school to admit his older daughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4358

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2004

17 juin 2004

applicant applied to the state school at which his son was a pupil for permission to enrol him in Koranic classes so that he could study the Koran and its interpretation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2651

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2007

26 juin 2007

The judge had allegedly threatened the school authorities with retaliation. The applicants did not learn of the composition of the panel until the day of the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9053

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 1996

18 décembre 1996

Greece - 21787/93 Judgment 18.12.1996 Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Respect for parents' religious convictions Penalty of a day's suspension from school for failure to take part in a school parade on grounds

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9052

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 1996

18 décembre 1996

and then one day's suspension from school for failure to take part in a school parade on grounds of pupil's religious beliefs: no violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14325

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

They were prohibited from wearing the Islamic veil in their schools, with the exception of non-denominational religious and ethics classes, by the 2016-2017 school regulations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0310DEC006205900

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2005

10 mars 2005

classes in the Kođađik school. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC003293202

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

While in primary school, the second applicant followed religious instruction in school.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407JUD000688411

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2015

7 avril 2015

works in the school. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175712

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2017

28 juin 2017

    During the 2013/2014 school year N.M. followed online studies in a distance learning school.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1579940-1656305

Admin. suprême

7 février 2006

7 février 2006

  Between 1996 and 1999 they were placed in special schools (zvláštní   školy) for children with learning difficulties unable to follow the ordinary school curriculum.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003650597

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

    In the school-year 1996-1997, when she began intermediate school, the applicant could not be granted the assistance of a remedial teacher.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164135

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

In 2007, having reached the age of seven, the third applicant was enrolled in municipal school no. 3 of the settlement of Gribanovskiy (“the school”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12399

Admin. suprême

28 février 2019

28 février 2019

at school of child with mental disorder: communicated The application concerns the authorities’ response to allegations that a child suffering from a mental disorder was ill-treated and bullied at school

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11422

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

that, at the age of four, he had been ill-treated by teachers when attending nursery school.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9476

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

, asked to be enrolled in the prison school.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222226

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2022

8 décembre 2022

Without informing the applicant, the mother enrolled J. in a private catholic school near her new residence starting from the school year 2012/2013.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD001114611

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2013

29 janvier 2013

by a special vocational school. 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0829DEC005510309

Admin. suprême

29 août 2017

29 août 2017

    Ms T., director of Mohyliv-Podilskiy’s school no. 5, brought a claim for defamation, alleging that the content of the letter unmistakably pointed to her and to her school.

Source officielle

Page 12 sur 331

← PrécédentSuivant →