RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW Civil Code of 2003 23 .     The relevant extracts from the Civil Code of 2003, as worded at the material time, read as follows: Article 386.

  The Code of Civil Procedure (Act no. 3 of 1952)   a.

Relevant domestic law Article 339 (1) of the Civil Code provides that any person who unlawfully causes damage to another shall be liable to pay compensation.

  83/1990) and Article 80 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Under Article 577 (1) in conjunction with Article 275 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure 2007 (“the 2007 Code”), a notary’s refusal to certify a document can be appealed against before the relevant regional

L. 4121-1 et L. 4624-1du code du travail, ensemble l'article 1315 du code civil, devenu 1353 du code civil ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que Mme W... a été engagée par la société Hôpital privé La

Accordingly, the applicant’s status as a civil servant as such does not exclude the applicability of Article 6.

700 du code de procédure civile.

Relevant domestic law Article 339 (1) of the Civil Code provides that any person who unlawfully causes damage to another shall be liable to pay compensation.

On 16 January 2001, the district court granted the agency's request and reopened the judgment under Article 333 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It convicted the applicant of defamation through the media under Article 212 of the Criminal Code.

L. 622-20 et L. 641-4 du code de commerce, ensemble l'article 31 du code de procédure civile ; Attendu que, pour condamner la société Bostik à réparer le préjudice subi par la société MPH, l'arrêt retient

    Code of Criminal procedure, as in force until 1 July 2002 Article 29.

Code on Administrative Offences 1984 (as worded at the material time) 29 .

rules leading to a restriction of the procedural rights of the accused or the victim (Article 248, CPC, as worded at the relevant time).

Code of civil Procedure (2004) 16 .     Article 74 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as in force at the material time, set out the rules for the notification of parties to proceedings.

(Article 333 § 3 (b) of the Code).

It further drew on the Constitutional Court’s judgment no. 349 of 24 October 2007, whereby Article 5 bis of Legislative Decree no. 333 of 11 July 1992, as amended by Law no. 662 of 1996, had been declared

    Article   11 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1964 then in force provided that regional and higher courts may conduct “supervisory review” of the decisions of the lower courts.