In the leading case of Idalov v.

    In the leading cases of Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012 and Butko v.

It considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

    As regards the background, legislative and case-law developments leading to and surrounding the adoption of the Uniformity Act see Merkantil Car Zrt. and Others, cited above, §§ 5-16 and

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v.

    In the leading case of Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, 8 December 2009, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 15.

    In the leading cases of Spahić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017, and Kunić and Others v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v.

    In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine, (nos.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    In the leading cases of Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, 10   March 2009, Akhlyustin v. Russia, no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and   Others, cited above, Dudchenko v.

    The Court found violations in respect of issues similar to those in the present case in the leading cases set out in the appended table. 11.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

In the Court’s view, leaving the secret surveillance operation to the sole discretion of law enforcement authorities, the domestic law failed to provide adequate safeguards against various possible abuses

    In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154 ‑ 58, 161 ‑ 65, 22 May 2012, and Lebedev v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.