CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 835 résultats pour « Walent »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC002832003

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

He maintained his earlier claims and added that there was a warrant for his arrest and proceedings pending against him before the national courts in Bangladesh.

Source officielle

Page 126 sur 342

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD001594411

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

    In July 2011, after the communication of the present case to the Government, the Moldovan authorities applied to Interpol for an international arrest warrant for the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0119DEC002566494

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 1995

19 janvier 1995

reasons for summoning him ("motif: vous sera            communiqué sur place");         -     an arrest warrant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213DEC005778917

Admin. suprême

13 février 2018

13 février 2018

Referring to a warrant issued by the German authorities which indicated, inter alia, that the applicant had been convicted to a term of three years and five months’ imprisonment for sexual assault and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC002004813

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

There was a valid search warrant against him which the Government had not proved to be a fake. Moreover, he had been tortured by sleep deprivation and by the so-called “hooding” method.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD003420517

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

He stated that he had not been responsible for the search of the applicant’s home and that he had not drafted the search warrant on 22 March 2014. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC003197303

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

    She was arrested on 26 February 2003, by virtue of an arrest warrant issued by prosecutor E.E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:1005DEC000552372

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 1974

5 octobre 1974

  2.2.2 Furthermore, the applicant complains that his guilt was not only presumed but alleged in the various warrants of arrest, letters rogatory, and statements made before by Austrian officials

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008DEC000225111

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2013

8 octobre 2013

He gave his wallet to Y.Z. stating that it was bothering him. Following the order to fire, V.K. pulled the trigger several times but the rifle jammed.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2010:45

CJUE

28 janvier 2010

28 janvier 2010

#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division - Jungtinė Karalystė.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2012:9

CJUE

12 janvier 2012

12 janvier 2012

#Verzoek van de High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, om een prejudiciële beslissing.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2003:49

CJUE

23 janvier 2003

23 janvier 2003

#Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) - Regatul Unit.#Cauza C-106/01.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2004:192

CJUE

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - Vereinigtes Königreich.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2006:235

CJUE

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

#Pedido de decisão prejudicial: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - Reino Unido.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2001:356

CJUE

26 juin 2001

26 juin 2001

#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Crown Office) - Ujedinjena Kraljevina.#Socijalna politika - Direktiva 93/104/EZ.#Predmet C-173/99.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD000989802

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

The issuance of the enforcement warrant The enforcement warrant is issued by the court to the creditor, after the judgment has become final, except for cases of immediate enforcement, when the enforcement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160000

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2015

16 décembre 2015

On 16 March 2010 the Rochefort investigating judge issued an arrest warrant against C.B. and on 11 June 2010 the Rochefort tribunal de grande instance issued a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) due to her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC007710313

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

The court decided to issue an arrest warrant against another accused. Further groups of accused were to be heard in a separate trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0509DEC004244208

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2016

9 mai 2016

minimis non curat praetor , this admissibility criterion hinges on the idea that a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, should attain a minimum level of severity to warrant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC003566111

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

    The Government stressed that no material, evidence or ground had been presented by the applicant to warrant concluding that he would specifically be subjected to torture or to inhuman or

Source officielle