CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC002832003
12 octobre 2004
He maintained his earlier claims and added that there was a warrant for his arrest and proceedings pending against him before the national courts in Bangladesh.
Page 126 sur 342
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD001594411
2 mai 2017
In July 2011, after the communication of the present case to the Government, the Moldovan authorities applied to Interpol for an international arrest warrant for the applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0119DEC002566494
19 janvier 1995
reasons for summoning him ("motif: vous sera communiqué sur place"); - an arrest warrant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213DEC005778917
13 février 2018
Referring to a warrant issued by the German authorities which indicated, inter alia, that the applicant had been convicted to a term of three years and five months’ imprisonment for sexual assault and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC002004813
21 octobre 2014
There was a valid search warrant against him which the Government had not proved to be a fake. Moreover, he had been tortured by sleep deprivation and by the so-called “hooding” method.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD003420517
19 octobre 2021
He stated that he had not been responsible for the search of the applicant’s home and that he had not drafted the search warrant on 22 March 2014. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC003197303
22 novembre 2011
She was arrested on 26 February 2003, by virtue of an arrest warrant issued by prosecutor E.E.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:1005DEC000552372
5 octobre 1974
2.2.2 Furthermore, the applicant complains that his guilt was not only presumed but alleged in the various warrants of arrest, letters rogatory, and statements made before by Austrian officials
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008DEC000225111
8 octobre 2013
He gave his wallet to Y.Z. stating that it was bothering him. Following the order to fire, V.K. pulled the trigger several times but the rifle jammed.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2010:45
28 janvier 2010
#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division - Jungtinė Karalystė.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:9
12 janvier 2012
#Verzoek van de High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, om een prejudiciële beslissing.
ECLI:EU:C:2003:49
23 janvier 2003
#Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) - Regatul Unit.#Cauza C-106/01.
ECLI:EU:C:2004:192
30 mars 2004
#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - Vereinigtes Königreich.
ECLI:EU:C:2006:235
6 avril 2006
#Pedido de decisão prejudicial: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - Reino Unido.
ECLI:EU:C:2001:356
26 juin 2001
#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Crown Office) - Ujedinjena Kraljevina.#Socijalna politika - Direktiva 93/104/EZ.#Predmet C-173/99.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD000989802
15 juin 2004
The issuance of the enforcement warrant The enforcement warrant is issued by the court to the creditor, after the judgment has become final, except for cases of immediate enforcement, when the enforcement
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160000
16 décembre 2015
On 16 March 2010 the Rochefort investigating judge issued an arrest warrant against C.B. and on 11 June 2010 the Rochefort tribunal de grande instance issued a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) due to her
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC007710313
12 décembre 2017
The court decided to issue an arrest warrant against another accused. Further groups of accused were to be heard in a separate trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0509DEC004244208
9 mai 2016
minimis non curat praetor , this admissibility criterion hinges on the idea that a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, should attain a minimum level of severity to warrant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC003566111
12 mai 2015
The Government stressed that no material, evidence or ground had been presented by the applicant to warrant concluding that he would specifically be subjected to torture or to inhuman or