Serghides , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Diana Sârcu , judges , and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the applications (nos. 1606/19 and 19579/16) against the Republic

of the immigration authorities not to renew the applicant’s temporary residence permit and their subsequent refusal to allow him to enter the Republic had not been disproportionate to the legitimate aim

xa0; In the case of Rimschi and Others v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Jovan Ilievski , President ,   Diana

According to the parliamentary report, the new draft law ‘aims to find solutions to all those undealt [with issues] and pending situations, because proceeding with the current framework is impossible (

the aim sought to be achieved (see, among many other authorities,   Pet ko Petkov v.

He therefore contended that his provisional detention had not been ordered to achieve any aims relating to the investigation but to scare and pressure him.

In order to take care of his daughter, the applicant would initially need daily guidance, with the aim of progressing to independent living.

He further contended that it had not pursued a legitimate aim, especially as regards his letters to the Ombudsman and other state authorities, and had not been necessary in a democratic society. 79.

If the Court were to find otherwise, the Government submitted that the restriction had pursued a legitimate aim and had been proportionate. 72.

The use of these measures shall exclusively be for the aim of preventing a crime or to ascertain the truth during an investigation of a criminal case, if no other methods to obtain information exist.

    The applicant, Ms Diana Vučina, is a Croatian national who was born in 1966 and lives in Split. She was represented before the Court by Mr   S.

the legal definition of a ‘foreign agent’ is not sufficiently narrowly tailored to serve as a basis for restrictive measures that would be ‘necessary in a democratic society’ in order to achieve the aims

In the case of S.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Mykola

In the case of Damian v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Diana Sârcu,  

European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ioannis Ktistakis , President ,   Peeter Roosma,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir,   Diana

2022 as a Chamber composed of:   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro , President,   Carlo Ranzoni ,   Egidijus Kūris ,   Pauliine Koskelo ,   Jovan Ilievski ,   Saadet Yüksel ,   Diana

  7188 [1] read as follows: “In this context and focusing particularly on the offences directly linked to freedom of expression, the aim is to prevent differing practices and thus to achieve uniform

Ghimpu and Others v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Jovan Ilievski,   Diana

sitting on 25   June 2024 as a Chamber composed of:   Arnfinn Bårdsen , President ,   Pauliine Koskelo,   Saadet Yüksel,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Frédéric Krenc,   Diana