This investigation is still pending but, the Government state, there exists no evidence in respect of the alleged incident.

On 24 May 2006 the applicant submitted yet another application to the Migration Board on behalf of his alleged family members.

  Russia IK-5 49580/17 77356/14 14128/14 64761/13 63741/12 The applicant alleged having been subjected to pressure in the following ways:   - alleged seizure of the applicant’s correspondence

    The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment in police custody and the alleged lack of an effective investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment (Article 3 of the Convention

    Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 15.

The applicant’s alleged beating was then included in a large-scale criminal investigation covering many episodes of alleged ill-treatment of inmates in, inter alia , the prison hospital. 5.

The application concerns the alleged secondary victimisation of the applicant in the course of a preliminary investigation by the Investigative Committee for the Privolzhskiy District of Kazan and a trial

alleged lack of skills in child rearing; his mental disability; the fact that the child’s mother had no legal capacity; and the first applicant’s financial situation.

The District Governor asked the Ovacık Gendarmerie Headquarters for information about the alleged incident.

The alleged ill-treatment of the applicant and the related investigation 5 .

    The various alleged incidents of the applicants’ ill-treatment 1.

Communicated on 31 May 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 14191/14 Liliana STRAISTĂ against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 10 February 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Communicated on 28 February 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 49444/13 Ion DUMITRU against Romania lodged on 25 July 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged

, Rahova, Jilava, Slobozia, Dej and Miercurea-Ciuc Prisons; b)     the transport conditions he experienced when he was transferred between the said prison facilities; c)     the alleged

    The applicant complained under Article 5 §§ 1 (f) and 4 of the Convention about an alleged unlawfulness of his detention pending removal from Russia as well as about an alleged lack of an

and the other alleged irregularities were not such as to justify a transfer to another Disciplinary Committee.

    In the present case the alleged ongoing violations ceased in March 2022 when the applicants returned to Sweden. 10.

L., another young woman who was present at the time of the alleged rape by the applicant, gave evidence for the defence and denied that J. had been sexually abused by him.

    The applicant alleged that none of the doctors’ recommendations were followed by the prison authorities.