Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC003213310
16 juin 2015
16 juin 2015
The matter was thus remitted to the first-instance for re-examination and it has been pending there since. 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD003690003
3 mars 2015
3 mars 2015
if there had not been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD002975506
1 juillet 2014
1 juillet 2014
According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC004409205
9 juin 2009
9 juin 2009
However, the Court notes that the applicants have now been granted a residence permit in the Netherlands and that they are thus no longer at risk of being expelled.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323DEC002674807
23 mars 2010
23 mars 2010
SECTION DECISION Application no. 26748/07 by Jan Jeffrey KROPS against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 23 March 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Josep
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129JUD006629301
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
On 10 April 2007 the Registry requested the applicant's representatives to confirm by 16 May 2007 whether a friendly settlement had been reached in Mr Celia's case following the decision
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2659940-2906542
10 mars 2009
10 mars 2009
without having been examined at a public hearing.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1864413-1957778
5 décembre 2006
5 décembre 2006
The forensic expert found that the shot had been fired at a downward angle.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2034653-2150249
12 juin 2007
12 juin 2007
Indeed, the parties had not been in dispute about the fact that N.A.’s accusation concerning Mr Matei’s protection of a criminal gang had been made.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527DEC000568402
27 mai 2008
27 mai 2008
THE LAW The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he had been denied a fair hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC002714514
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
applicant should not been extradited to the Russian Federation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305DEC004760707
5 mars 2013
5 mars 2013
She wanted compensation for the period of time that she had not been allowed to work as she had not been legally in the Netherlands.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68138-68606
13 septembre 2000
13 septembre 2000
The other plots of land (125,314 sq. m) were not returned because they had already been assigned to third parties.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68315-68783
26 septembre 2000
26 septembre 2000
The Court held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 concerning the lack of a public hearing before the specialised tribunal and, unanimously, that there had been a violation
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68040-68508
8 septembre 1999
8 septembre 1999
On 24 November 1988, using its right of pre-emption and claiming that Mr Beyeler had failed to inform the ministry that in 1977 the painting had been bought on his behalf, Italy bought the painting for
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68112-68580
21 mars 2000
21 mars 2000
On appeal, the applicant was convicted on 10 October 1994 by the Bucharest Regional Court, which held that he had intended to defame since he must have been aware when making his comments in the journalists
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003457504
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
It was subsequently established by ballistics examinations that three firearms had been used and that the weapons had been used in other incidents.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC002794507
3 novembre 2011
3 novembre 2011
In particular, he complained that he had not been afforded access to a lawyer during police questioning, that he had not been allowed time to prepare his defence but had been questioned immediately upon
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC004775410
6 mars 2012
6 mars 2012
The first applicant argued mainly that he had only been the driver for the two other defendants, that they had been the ones who put in place the fake bank cards scheme and that he had not been aware of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129DEC008327517
29 janvier 2019
29 janvier 2019
The applicant, Mr Joseph Calleja, is a Maltese national, who was born in 1945 and lives in Qormi. He was represented before the Court by Dr J.
Source officiellePage 13 sur 136