CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201615
7 février 2020
In the same vein, the application further pertains to the alleged absence of the applicant’s lawyer during the investigative measures carried out in the course of the preliminary investigation stage (see
Page 13 sur 2617
ECLI:CEDH:001-179013
3 novembre 2017
Ponomarenko (“the first applicant”) during his pre-trial detention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD007129517
13 octobre 2022
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention during their transport.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202313
4 mars 2020
During that meeting she had told J.Y. and the man in question that she had to visit Belgium.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0421JUD002591421
21 avril 2026
Furthermore, the mother had not been obliged to be present during the questioning against her son’s express wishes.
ECLI:CEDH:001-165761
21 juillet 2016
The cell had no table, locker or hanging space and had been disinfected only once during the period of his detention.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13868
8 novembre 2022
Nazaryan, a contractual military officer who died allegedly by suicide during his military service.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206JUD006750317
6 février 2025
The applicant complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during his transport. He relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116641
14 janvier 2013
According to his submissions, he was subjected to ill-treatment during his time there.
ECLI:CEDH:001-191281
30 janvier 2019
The applicant company complains that the State Court ( Sud Bosne i Hercegovine ) failed to communicate to it observations of the Competition Council filed during the judicial review proceedings.
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C210901
2 octobre 2025
CIV. 2 MW2 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 2 octobre 2025 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction de
ECLI:CEDH:001-179387
13 novembre 2017
the applicant’s conviction for illicit making of drugs and his allegation that his conviction was based to a significant extent on his self-incriminating explanations made in the absence of a lawyer during
ECLI:CEDH:001-184996
28 juin 2018
In particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicant during the preliminary investigation (see Salduz v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210449
17 mai 2021
The applicant’s child – aged four at the time of the application – was staying with his mother in the women’s section of the same prison (during the day, at the kindergarten and during the night, in the
ECLI:CEDH:001-110592
6 mars 2012
Were the applicants’ complaints about their alleged ill-treatment, unlawful deprivation of liberty and interference with their right to respect for their private life during the police raid
ECLI:CEDH:002-4167
5 octobre 2004
He alleged that in 1998, during the war between Eritrea and Ethiopia, there was a general mobilisation and he was called up to serve in the army.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167283
15 septembre 2016
He also contended that during the proceedings conducted in his absence he had not been effectively represented.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161253
9 février 2016
The opinion of a psychiatrist was also commissioned and it stated that the applicant’s attempted suicide during his detention in 1992 could not be linked to the applicant’s ill-treatment during that detention
ECLI:CEDH:001-155301
18 mai 2015
On 8 June 2012 he was arrested on suspicion of having participated in mass disorders and of having used violence against the police during the demonstration of 6 May 2012.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12480
28 mai 2019
13 Effective remedy Structural shortcoming which rendered ineffective an order to ensure that prisoners’ basic needs were met during a strike in prisons: violation Facts – In the spring of 2016 strike