courts with a view to terminating leases on flats, relying on section 40(1) of the Lease of Flats Act.

Kh. told them to find out which of the flats the man had entered and whether there was someone in flat no. 86.

half the flat had been UAH 73,878.

The police found that both participants in the alleged attack were providing confusing statements. 21.

the flat.

obliged to vacate the owner’s flat and to move into the flat [proposed to him], provided that the [condition of] the flat in question complies with the requirements laid down by this law in respect of

Only families with both spouses younger than thirty six were eligible.

He submitted that the flat had been assigned to Mr X and his wife, Ms Y, on 2 June 1976 and that after their divorce, Ms Y had been provided with a substitute flat, Mr X having continued to occupy the

It ordered the defendants to vacate the flat within fifteen days of being provided with an alternative flat.

that that flat was the applicant’s actual home. 39.

    The applicants are the owners of a flat in Milan, which they had let to G.M. and R.C. 9.

though she had made a statutory declaration on 9 May 1989 confirming that she urgently needed the flat for her own use. 28.

It held that both sets of tenants had lawfully occupied the flats on the basis of occupancy authorisations. It found that a room situated on the first floor had been vacated by J.Dh. It ordered F.

Along with the applicant, he was registered by the local authority as a co-tenant of flat A on the grounds that both of them had become members of the original tenants’ family. 9.

In 2013 the applicant, E.M. and a real-estate company had agreed that the new flat would pass to E.M., while the 2007 flat would remain with the applicant, each paying “his respective loan”. 7 .

The servicemen surrounded building no. 34 on that street, broke into flat no.

However, the applicant’s former wife refused to leave the flat and the decision ordering the occupants to leave the flat was stayed on   17   March   2004.

[co-defendant A.] lost his ownership in respect of this flat, despite the fact that this flat should have been seized [already] on 5 August 2002.

s flat. On 4 March 1995, the Chief Constable, who was on annual leave, gave oral authorisation to proceed.

The house was taken under state management after the entering into force, on 13 February 1946, of a decree giving the Polish authorities power to assign flats in privately-owned buildings to particular