Estonie , n o 55939/00, § 64 in fine , 15   février 2005, et Jabłoński c. Pologne , n o 33492/96, § 83, 21   décembre   2000). 63.

  3, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 45.

Estonia , no. 55939/00, § 64, 15   February 2005, and Jabłoński v.   Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21   December 2000). 52.

Estonie , n o 55939/00, § 64 in   fine , 15   février 2005, Jabłoński c. Pologne , n o 33492/96, § 83, 21   décembre 2000, et Shabani c.

  36, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no.   33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000).

  36, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   83, 21   December 2000). 48.

special need for a swift decision determining the lawfulness of detention pending trial because the defendant should benefit fully from the principle of the presumption of innocence (see, for instance, Jabłoński

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

  3, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 50.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

Estonia , no. 55939/00, §   64, 15   February 2005, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   83, 21   December 2000).

  3, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 45.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a   reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

  3, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no.   33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 47.

  3, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 54.

Poland , no. 15479/02, 4 October 2005, § 44, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21   December 2000). 54.

Jabłoński , Mr   J. Młynarczyk ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mrs   R. Orlikowska-wrońska ,   Counsel , Mr   Z. Brodecki ,   Adviser , Mr   P.

requirement of a decision on the merits within a reasonable time has been met (see, for example, Abdoella v. the Netherlands , judgment of 25   November 1992, Series A no. 248-A, p. 17, §   24; Jabłoński