On 1 April 1996 the applicant was arrested by gendarmerie officers while he was leaving Batman.

ordered the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutiya) to pay the applicant 683,619 Russian roubles (RUB) from the federal budget funds allocated for providing the housing subsidies for persons leaving

He asserted that the Law on Restructuring of Lending Agencies contradicted the Constitution.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending

#Zesde btw-richtlijn - Artikelen 11, A, lid 1, sub a, en 13, B, sub a en d - Leasing - Kunstmatige splitsing van prestatie in verschillende onderdelen - Gevolgen - Vermindering van maatstaf van heffing

    The Court has already found that as regards serious allegations concerning use of lethal force under Article 2 of the Convention, an inquiry alone is not capable of leading to the punishment

    The Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case in the leading cases set out in the appended table. 9.

    In the leading case of Karnaushenko v. Ukraine, no. 23853/02, 30   November 2006, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Kirinčić and Others v. Croatia, no. 31386/17, 30 July 2020, and Mirjana Marić v.

    In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015); Huseynli and Others v.

    In the leading case of Rutkowski and Others v. Poland, nos.

    In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v.

event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28   March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Rutkowski and Others v.   Poland, nos.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v.

    In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, 9   November 2010), Isayeva v. Azerbaijan (no. 36229/11, 25 June 2015), and Zayidov v.

    In the leading case of Ishkhanyan (cited above), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (§§   160-62). 9.

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v.

    In the leading case of R. Kačapor and Others v.