Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pitkänen case delivered on 9   March 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hirvisaari case delivered on 27 September 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jarreau case delivered on 8   April   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mahieu case delivered on 19   June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Vermeersch case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Puzinas case delivered on 14   March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Santos and another case delivered on 14 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Metzger case delivered on 31 May 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Société Comabat case delivered on 26 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Since the whole judgment had not been served on the applicant, the issues decided in it became res judicata one year and 45 days after it had been deposited with the registry, namely in September 1993.

  Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Nowicky case delivered on 24   February   2005 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of SA Cabinet Diot and SA Gras Savoye delivered on 22   July   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

xa0; Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the SA Dangeville case delivered on 16   April   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Parege case delivered on 9 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Erdős case delivered on 9   April   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lacombe case delivered on 7   November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Martins   and   Garcia   Alves delivered on 16 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Teret case delivered on 15 November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ribes case delivered on 7   May   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Nascimento case delivered on 27 September 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become