Except in the paradigm case of close confinement in a prison cell, where there is no room for argument, the absolute nature of the right requires a more exacting examination of the relevant criteria.

    The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented successively by the European Roma Rights Centre, an association based in Budapest, and by Ms M. Macovei, Ms A.

He identified two ORB-2 officers who were present in the room and who immediately beat the applicant up in the presence of the investigator.

    Although there had been a period when the monitoring screens (which relayed pictures from cameras in the interview rooms to a central control room) had not been monitored by the duty inspector

    In the course of further investigation, the authorities increased the charges, eventually imputing to the applicant organisation of a gang and participation in over thirty robberies.

[I.E.] was silent, [I.A.] expressed his dissatisfaction in the form of revolt, stating that he would not stay in the room as long as his mother was there.

He also designated the station’s break room as the place where the individuals taken into custody would be held. He delegated authority over the detainees to two senior officers, C.S. and F.C. 11.

At 10 a.m. the applicant was taken to Police Station No. 22 where she was detained in a room with other residents of the building.

From a constitutional point of view, a court cannot be criticised for having remained silent.

When the fourth applicant started to cry, one of them ordered her in Russian to keep silent. 15.

S.F. claimed that while he had been calling the police, the applicant had tried to leave the room.

measuring at least twelve square metres, a room for an assistant midwife of at least nine square metres, a waiting room measuring at least nine square metres, and toilet facilities for staff and patients

They had also left the applicant in a room alone with the written testimony of D.P., who by that time had confessed to taking part in smuggling the cigarettes and had incriminated the applicant.

The applicant alleged, however, that she had to wash herself, along with ten to fifteen other detainees, using wash-basins in a room measuring 4 x 4 metres which adjoined another room measuring 2 x 2 metres

M.R. arrived at the Rijeka Police Station at 6.40 p.m. and together they went to the room where Ivan Dvorski was.

However, the evidence against the defendant was uncertain, indecisive, or incomplete, leaving room for doubt about his guilt, and therefore it had to apply the in dubio pro reo principle.

The officers entered the hotel, opening and sometimes breaking the doors of hotel rooms, and pinning Mr Dimitrov’s brother and some hotel guests to the ground.

In addition, the Veliko Tarnovo Court of Appeal found that the Ruse Regional Court had indeed stated in its reasoning that the applicant had attempted to rob the house of Mr K.D.

Then they blocked the women in one room and forced the Musikhanov men into another. The intruders ordered the Musikhanov men to remain silent and not to move and checked their identity documents.

I recommend to these [people] to hide the shame of their thinking and remain silent. Lithuania is now free.