What deed (document or physical action of a public authority) constituted the interference in the present cases? What was the law applicable to the relevant form of deprivation of property?

E.S. said: “You think you know what military service is, how old are you?” C.Ö. answered that he was twenty five years old. He repeated what he had said.

At the time there was no legal guidance on what a reasonable excuse would be under that section.

As a result, the applicant does not know what he must do to be considered for release and under what conditions. 28.

The result of that would determine what treatment was needed.

If so, what was the date of the final decision?   2.

It is unclear on what basis the applicant resided in Russia. According to the documents submitted, his stay in Russia was authorised until 28 March 2016.

However, there is no indication in the case file as to what actions had been carried out and what the results of those actions had been in order to conclude that the involvement of military personnel in

who were cautioned that it might harm their defence if they omitted to mention anything which they later relied on in court, said that they understood but replied "No comment" when asked to explain what

They had been given the opportunity to explain their financial situation and to describe what had happened to the assets which the judge had taken into account in setting the benefit figure.

    What was the legal basis for the first applicant’s removal to Iran on 1   April 2017?

    What was the scope of review of the domestic courts, which examined the applicant’s appeals against the exclusion order?

A B détenu au travers la société What Else Invest, de droit luxembourgeois.

What did this evidence add at the trial to the prosecution case?

If not, in what way are asylum seekers meant to obtain such essentials?   3.

    What was the cause of P.A.’s death? 2.     Were the actions taken by the doctors and medical staff of Detention Centre no.

At what was supposed to be the final hearing on 31 January 2020, the applicant was asked to amend again the summary of her action, after she had been paid a certain amount of salary by the defendant .

If not, in what way are asylum seekers meant to obtain such essentials?   3.