CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111075
10 avril 2012
4. Having regard to the procedural protection from ill-treatment under Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v.
Page 14 sur 4049
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126DEC003286709
26 novembre 2019
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that he had been denied the assistance of a lawyer during the initial stages of the criminal proceedings, and that his conviction
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:SO00374
23 mars 2022
à l'article L. 2312-21 ou à défaut d'accord au sous-paragraphe 4 intitulé « base de données économiques et sociales », du paragraphe 3 « dispositions supplétives » de la sous-section 3 « consultations
CTX PROTECTION SOCIALE
6a174c73cdc6046d4726ebc4
22 mai 2026
Par ailleurs, les conditions posées par l’article L. 160-14-4 du code de la sécurité sociale pour obtenir la reconnaissance d’une affection longue durée sont distinctes de celles relatives au contrôle
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403DEC004711999
3 avril 2001
The application was based, inter alia , on Articles 30, 33, 34 and 35 of the Cypriot Constitution, and Articles 6, 13 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as certain provisions of
ECLI:CEDH:001-196831
17 septembre 2019
Sections 4(2)(a) and (b) are derived from article 5.2(a) and (b) of the European Convention on State Immunity.
613723f8cd58014677410917
14 mai 2002
CIDF-ANPE, qu'il n'était pas explicité quels étaient les termes de cette convention ou les articles qu'elle aurait violés dans l'exercice de ses fonctions et, partant que l'employeur, contrairement à
ECLI:CEDH:001-188519
22 novembre 2018
When did the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention start applying to the applicant in the instant case?
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0302DEC002178093
2 mars 1994
They admit that the disclosure of the opinion on the applicant's mental state interfered with his right to respect for his privacy as guaranteed by Article 8 para. 1 (Art. 8-1) of the Convention, but argue
ECLI:CEDH:001-126674
5 septembre 2013
In its 2012 Resolution, it notes that Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights takes precedence over the provisions of Article 33 of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0513DEC007424501
13 mai 2004
This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC001806013
18 février 2021
35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155064
4 mai 2015
Were the domestic proceedings in respect of the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment compatible with the procedural requirements of Article 3 of the Convention? 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD006028609
The applicant alleged that his deportation to Nigeria would breach Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention. 4.
cr
61372605cd58014677422559
7 décembre 1999
36 du traité CEE ; 4 ) "alors que, en toute hypothèse, le contrôle imposé par l'Etat-membre et s'ajoutant au contrôle communautaire n'est justifié au regard de l'article 36 du traité de Rome qu'à la
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0118JUD002729116
18 janvier 2018
Article 8 and Article 13 of the Convention 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0619JUD001244004
19 juin 2014
Holds that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention; 4.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12659
21 novembre 2019
In the Convention proceedings, they complained that they had been unlawfully deprived of their liberty (Article 5 § 1 of the Convention) and of the conditions in which they were held (Article 3).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD005094220
18 juillet 2024
50942/20 and 2022/21) against the Republic of Latvia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by seven
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD003208419
10 février 2022
of the Convention concerning the role played in the applicant’s trial and conviction by evidence taken in his absence at the pre-trial stage when he had no legal representation from witnesses who were