AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613DEC002296215
13 juin 2017
13 juin 2017
He considered that the drafters of Article 3 of the Protocol did not have in mind a secession referendum but that, had they had it in mind, they would have expressly provided that a right to vote in it
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD004615999
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
Moreover, owing to the lapse of time since the lodging of the applications, new situations might have arisen: the properties could have been transferred, donated or inherited within the legal system of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC007563611
4 octobre 2016
4 octobre 2016
The applicant could have complained separately about his unlawful detention, but had failed to do so.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179765
6 décembre 2017
6 décembre 2017
Arrest of the applicants Since 2010 Greenpeace International and other national and regional Greenpeace organisations have been promoting a “Save the Arctic” campaign.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003DEC005563414
3 octobre 2017
3 octobre 2017
The presidential pardon should therefore have applied to the sentence passed by the Supreme Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0915DEC002345094
15 septembre 1997
15 septembre 1997
whatsoever in doing so, as they have settled in Trentino, where they have their jobs, home, social life and interests.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC004548208
27 mai 2014
27 mai 2014
Tomislav JOVEVSKI against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 27 May 2014 as a Committee composed of: Linos-Alexandre
Source officiellePôle 5 - Chambre 10
5fdd25ce2c19e78ebcd075a3
8 octobre 2018
8 octobre 2018
Demeurant Le Haras D... [...] 07503 FROYENNES / BELGIQUE née le [...] à SAINT OMER Madame Anne-Catherine X... Demeurant [...] / BELGIQUE née le [...] à SAINT OMER Monsieur Henri X...
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201JUD004469806
1 décembre 2009
1 décembre 2009
already been exhausted or have not been prescribed.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC000535515
5 juillet 2016
5 juillet 2016
However, it is noted that the applicants have not made any submissions as to the reasons for which they have failed to submit any relevant documents supporting their Convention claims (see
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC006119908
19 mars 2013
19 mars 2013
That case-law was accessible to the applicants and they should have been aware of its existence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0829DEC001668290
29 août 1994
29 août 1994
The individual applicants were permanent residents of Famagusta, in northern Cyprus, where Turkish military forces have been stationed since 1974.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166861
30 août 2016
30 août 2016
In the decision in D.B.’s case, the Constitutional Court stated, in particular, that “The fact that the courts of last instance have been adopting discordant decisions while deciding on the same
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245398
18 septembre 2025
18 septembre 2025
2 Has the applicant’s right to a fair trial, including the right to examine or to have examined witnesses against him, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, been
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD003090906
10 avril 2012
10 avril 2012
the evolution of his illness, the State authorities should have made it possible to have Avastin rapidly included on the list of reimbursable drugs. 14 .
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142656
6 mars 2014
6 mars 2014
2008 13/02/2009 26838/03 RADU AUREL 04/11/2008 04/02/2009 26837/03 RANETE 13/11/2008 13/02/2009 26831/03 ŢARĂ LUNGĂ 08/07/2008 08/10/2008 1578/03 TEHLEANU 16/09/2008 16/12/2008 26833/03 VASILIU IANCU ALEXANDRU
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210445
17 mai 2021
17 mai 2021
The applicants’ arguments that the courts did have competence to examine their cases was not commented upon.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224834
25 avril 2023
25 avril 2023
font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 15 May 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 25712/21 Allegra Gaia Selvaggia GUCCI BARBIERI and Alessandra
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214818
2 décembre 2021
2 décembre 2021
Case Judgment of Final on 19548/04 COJOACĂ 26/11/2013 26/02/2014 28686/04 AKBAR 05/04/2011 05/04/2011 35049/08 SERCE 30/06/2015 30/09/2015 16986/12 ALEXANDRU ENACHE 03/10/2017 03/01/2018 80529/13 EZE 21
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD003402205
21 juillet 2009
21 juillet 2009
In the case of Alexandru Marius Radu v.
Source officiellePage 15 sur 100