CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169366
8 novembre 2016
Accordingly, they requested the amount of CZK 5,213,610 (EUR 192,953.73).
Page 15 sur 1809
ECLI:CEDH:001-246044
13 octobre 2025
In May 2016 S. brought civil proceedings against the applicant, seeking payment of the outstanding amount of the debt.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13482
18 novembre 2021
He was ordered to pay the defendant’s costs of the proceedings in an amount which was approximately double than that which he was awarded in damages.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222DEC002770216
22 février 2022
The Ivanić Grad Municipal Court assessed the amount of damage sustained to HRK 41,050 (approximately EUR 5,473).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD002243203
14 avril 2015
The Government contested that amount. 66.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC006172711
21 octobre 2014
other amount suggested by the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC000736112
26 novembre 2013
The Government consider that this amount will be an adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned violations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1205DEC000292913
5 décembre 2024
The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0918JUD003443104
18 septembre 2008
On 16 February 2004 the Town Court awarded the applicant arrears in the amount of RUB 16,765.50, and on 1 April 2004 the appeal court in addition fixed a new amount of periodic payments.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926JUD004754199
26 septembre 2002
from 1 December 1991 to 31 December 1995 and fixed the total amount to 5 086 200 GRD.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1221JUD004854899
21 décembre 2006
Housa, an amount of CZK 1,334,578, (iii) to Mr Luboš Macho, an amount of CZK 889,500, (iv) to Mr Tomáš Čuba, an amount of CZK 911,250, (v) to Mr Miroslav Havlák
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD002637404
20 décembre 2016
The second and third applicants claimed the difference between the amount confiscated and the amount refunded, the interest on the amount retained at the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC007273310
4 juin 2013
calculated from the amount of unpaid pension was paid to the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-194924
2 juillet 2019
After he paid the required amount, the tax decision that imposed on him the obligation to pay the main debt was declared null and void.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210142
28 avril 2021
of the fare for travelling on the Baku Metro (subway) and alleged “disappearance” of small amounts of deposited money from passengers’ travel cards.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229637
24 novembre 2023
The administration decided to expropriate the applicant’s plot of land for the construction of a dam and applied to the relevant first-instance courts to set the amount of the compensation award and to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627JUD003709597
27 juin 2002
For non-pecuniary damage the applicants claim a minimum amount of 200,000,000 GRD. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD003115407
21 mai 2015
The first set of non-contentious proceedings for determination of the amount of compensation for the expropriated land 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1118JUD004908318
As a precaution, the defendant also objected to the amount of damages claimed. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD001536411
7 décembre 2021
15364/11, the Court observes that the applicant did not submit any calculation of his losses in the amount of EUR 20,000.