company that had designed the dam had been negligent in failing to take account of the unfavourable climatic conditions or to include an emergency water-evacuation system, the chief public prosecutor held

application (no. 36492/02) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mr Artur

possibility of applying other measures of restraint; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - The applicant was held

against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Armenian nationals, Mr Artur

It held that the applicant's complaints did not raise any fair trial issues, but mainly concerned the assessment of evidence, which was the function of the lower courts. C.

Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 11.10 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 05/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; held

    On 8 October 2009 the Manisa Administrative Court held an on-site inspection in the presence of the experts and the parties.

restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   38407/21* 02/07/2021 Artur

Mr K.M. and three other men (Mr A.D., Mr S.M. and a certain Mr Artur) who had given passports and money to Sirazhudin Shafiyev for visas had gone to Imam Rasul.

9635/13) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Artur

applicant is the mother of a detainee whom she was not allowed to visit in detention Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy in respect of restrictions on family visits 3,500   30417/19 20/05/2019 Artur

quality of bedding and bed linen, no food Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000     29597/19 22/04/2019 Artur

9258/04) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Artur

Arthur of Thompsons Solicitors, Bristol, and by Mr J. Hendy QC and Mr   M.   Ford   QC, barristers practising in London. A.     The circumstances of the case 1.

He was represented by Mr Claus Bonnez, a lawyer practising in Aarhus. 3.

At the national level, each individual shall have appropriate access to information concerning the environment that is held by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities

    For the relevant provisions of domestic law on compensation of non ‑ pecuniary damage (physical and mental suffering), see Artur Ivanov v.

The Court further held as follows: “122.

In that decision, the Court further held as follows: “122.

Having returned home Mr Magomed Mestoyev told the applicants that he had been held in an unacknowledged detention facility on the suspicion of illegal activities.