CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C210825
18 septembre 2025
CIV. 2 EO1 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 18 septembre 2025 Irrecevabilité non spécialement motivée Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant
Page 15 sur 2617
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C210821
CIV. 2 EO1 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 18 septembre 2025 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C211018
23 octobre 2025
CIV. 2 EO1 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 23 octobre 2025 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction de
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:C210134
5 février 2026
CIV. 2 MW2 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 5 février 2026 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction de
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0706JUD002198705
6 juillet 2017
During his medical examination the applicant stated that he had been beaten up by the police officers at the police station during the night of 11 to 12 June 2004.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD000017622
6 mars 2025
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during his transport. He relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 7.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126526
29 août 2013
In January 1998 the applicant was detained for ten hours, during which he was allegedly beaten up by the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD006430419
4 juillet 2024
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0715JUD002989617
15 juillet 2025
He was arrested during the so ‑ called “Nardaran events” of 26 November 2015.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214424
23 novembre 2021
Turkey 15/05/2018 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 20 24628/18 Ağgül v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-204118
26 juin 2020
Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, during his stay in the Hotspot of Lampedusa, having regard in particular
ECLI:CEDH:001-182819
13 avril 2018
It further pertains to the applicant’s inability to examine or have examined the witnesses during the criminal proceedings (see Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD007744417
13 octobre 2022
The Court notes that the first applicant was detained in poor conditions during transport. The details of his detention during transport are indicated in the appended table.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1108DEC001662202
8 novembre 2007
The applicant complained under Article 3 that he had been ill-treated during his police custody between 11 and 19 May 1994 and during his detention on remand. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002547005
12 octobre 2010
Later the applicant hired another lawyer and, during the second round of questioning, rejected the charges against her and refused to make any statements.
ECLI:CEDH:001-154054
31 mars 2015
While his handcuffs were removed during the court sessions, the leg irons were kept on him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-224349
30 mars 2023
m; no heating, insufficient lighting; Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146657
5 septembre 2014
The applicant’s right of access to a lawyer was restricted during his police custody according to the now defunct Law no. 3842.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187017
18 septembre 2018
During the appeal stage, the applicant was informed that the building would be demolished.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3777
30 août 2005
.) - 68953/01 Decision 30.8.2005 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Military judge on the bench of a state security court during part of the trial: inadmissible