However, after a few months, he had managed to escape and, with the help of a smuggler, he had travelled to Sweden.

  In the context of the G8 summit held in Genoa, from 19 to 21 July 2001, numerous anti globalisation demonstrations were held in the city and substantial security arrangements were put in place by

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant   100,000 Austrian schillings for non-pecuniary damage.

  The applicant claimed that Sevastopol ITT was constantly overcrowded: he was held in cells of 15 to 22   m 2 with 25 to 30 inmates.

THE UNITED KINGDOM   Wednesday, 15 November 2000     The European Court of Human Rights held hearings on the merits of these two cases [1] , which were declared admissible on 1 March 2000

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 1,500,000 Portuguese escudos (PTE) for non-pecuniary damage.

  Summary of the facts   The applicant was arrested on suspicion of aggravated sexual assault and held in custody between 25 and 27 September 1994.

However, finding that a fair balance had not been struck between the public interest and the protection of the applicants’ rights, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article

A et la SOCIETE HELM FRANCE ; Vu la demande, enregistrée le 13 avril 2005 au greffe du tribunal administratif de Versailles, présentée pour M.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention on Human Rights by reason of an assault carried out on the applicants, prisoners

#Konkurrens - Förordning nr 17 - Undersökning - Grundläggande rätt att få ha sitt hem fredat - Motivering - Viten - Oriktigt förfarande.#Förenade målen 46/87 och 227/88.

Le Dauphin, conseiller référendaire, les observations de SCP Ancel et Couturier-Heller, avocat de la société Les Deux Routes, de Me Parmentier, avocat de M. X..., ès qualités, les conclusions de M.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicants ITL   10,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (Judgment in French).

The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1. (Judgment in French).   4)   Savvidou v.

  P.’s case was held in camera, although his second application was heard in open court.

Both the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords held that the detention was lawful in domestic law.

  The Court held: unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the medical care

    The Court therefore held, by five votes to two, that there had been no violation of Article 10. (The judgment is available only in French.)